Shenandoah Telecommunications Co (SHEN) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co (SHEN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.07x as of March 2024. Operating cash flow of $15.16 Million is below net income of $214.70 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore cash efficiency ratio of Shenandoah Telecommunications Co to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co Cash Flow Quality Index (1992–2023)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Shenandoah Telecommunications Co across 29 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check total reinvestment intensity of Shenandoah Telecommunications Co to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Shenandoah Telecommunications Co (1992–2023)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Shenandoah Telecommunications Co. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see market value of Shenandoah Telecommunications Co.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 14.15x | $113.77 Million | $8.04 Million | ▲ +144.7% |
| 2021 | -31.65x | $-250.93 Million | $7.93 Million | ▼ -127.4% |
| 2020 | 115.33x | $302.87 Million | $2.63 Million | ▲ +2344.9% |
| 2019 | 4.72x | $259.14 Million | $54.94 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2018 | 5.70x | $265.65 Million | $46.59 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2017 | 3.36x | $222.93 Million | $66.39 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2015 | 2.92x | $119.32 Million | $40.86 Million | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2014 | 3.39x | $114.99 Million | $33.88 Million | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2013 | 3.19x | $94.26 Million | $29.59 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2012 | 5.95x | $96.97 Million | $16.30 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2011 | 6.23x | $80.93 Million | $12.99 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2010 | 4.16x | $75.20 Million | $18.07 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 2009 | 4.91x | $74.07 Million | $15.09 Million | ▲ +139.2% |
| 2008 | 2.05x | $50.07 Million | $24.41 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2007 | 2.33x | $43.74 Million | $18.80 Million | ▲ +21.4% |
| 2006 | 1.92x | $34.35 Million | $17.92 Million | ▼ -44.8% |
| 2005 | 3.47x | $37.25 Million | $10.73 Million | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2004 | 3.36x | $34.42 Million | $10.24 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 2003 | 5.49x | $53.61 Million | $9.76 Million | ▲ +436.6% |
| 2001 | 1.02x | $16.76 Million | $16.37 Million | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2000 | 1.54x | $15.20 Million | $9.86 Million | ▼ -38.0% |
| 1999 | 2.49x | $16.01 Million | $6.43 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 1998 | 1.97x | $11.02 Million | $5.60 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 1997 | 1.89x | $8.47 Million | $4.48 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 1996 | 1.83x | $8.74 Million | $4.77 Million | ▲ +40.0% |
| 1995 | 1.31x | $8.16 Million | $6.23 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 1994 | 1.56x | $7.55 Million | $4.85 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 1993 | 1.43x | $6.60 Million | $4.60 Million | ▼ -21.4% |
| 1992 | 1.83x | $7.30 Million | $4.00 Million | — |