Shenandoah Telecommunications Co (SHEN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co (SHEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $23.96 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($995.92 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Shenandoah Telecommunications Co to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Shenandoah Telecommunications Co across 34 annual periods. Also explore Shenandoah Telecommunications Co (SHEN) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Shenandoah Telecommunications Co (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shenandoah Telecommunications Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Shenandoah Telecommunications Co (SHEN) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $101.00 Million | $941.47 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $62.57 Million | $739.23 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $113.77 Million | $561.56 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $74.89 Million | $339.71 Million | ▲ +121.8% |
| 2021 | -1.01x | $-250.93 Million | $248.46 Million | ▼ -582.6% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $302.87 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $259.14 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $265.65 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $222.93 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +54.5% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $161.53 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $119.32 Million | $338.80 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | $114.99 Million | $360.90 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2013 | 0.26x | $94.26 Million | $362.69 Million | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2012 | 0.27x | $96.97 Million | $362.89 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2011 | 0.29x | $80.93 Million | $282.32 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2010 | 0.27x | $75.20 Million | $276.13 Million | ▼ -64.7% |
| 2009 | 0.77x | $74.07 Million | $96.05 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 2008 | 0.51x | $50.07 Million | $98.37 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2007 | 0.62x | $43.74 Million | $70.40 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2006 | 0.47x | $34.35 Million | $72.53 Million | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2005 | 0.45x | $37.25 Million | $83.32 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2004 | 0.35x | $34.42 Million | $97.45 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 2003 | 0.68x | $53.61 Million | $79.16 Million | ▲ +88.8% |
| 2002 | 0.36x | $30.77 Million | $85.76 Million | ▲ +93.5% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $16.76 Million | $90.36 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | $15.20 Million | $82.30 Million | ▼ -30.4% |
| 1999 | 0.27x | $16.01 Million | $60.32 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | $11.02 Million | $41.63 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $8.47 Million | $41.00 Million | ▼ -18.4% |
| 1996 | 0.25x | $8.74 Million | $34.50 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 1995 | 0.43x | $8.16 Million | $19.13 Million | ▼ -6.1% |
| 1994 | 0.45x | $7.55 Million | $16.63 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 1993 | 0.36x | $6.60 Million | $18.50 Million | ▼ -20.8% |
| 1992 | 0.45x | $7.30 Million | $16.20 Million | — |