Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 62.50x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $125.00 Million exceeds net income of $2.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore ASH cash generation efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Ashland Global Holdings Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1989–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Ashland Global Holdings Inc across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Ashland Global Holdings Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Ashland Global Holdings Inc (1989–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see ASH company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.07x | $411.00 Million | $199.00 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2023 | 1.37x | $243.00 Million | $178.00 Million | ▲ +694.1% |
| 2022 | -0.23x | $-213.00 Million | $927.00 Million | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2021 | 2.55x | $560.00 Million | $220.00 Million | ▲ +433.4% |
| 2019 | 0.48x | $241.00 Million | $505.00 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2018 | 2.61x | $297.00 Million | $114.00 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2017 | 13.68x | $383.00 Million | $28.00 Million | ▲ +1169.3% |
| 2015 | 1.08x | $333.00 Million | $309.00 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2014 | 2.76x | $643.00 Million | $233.00 Million | ▲ +157.1% |
| 2013 | 1.07x | $733.00 Million | $683.00 Million | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2012 | 29.50x | $354.00 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +4884.9% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | $245.00 Million | $414.00 Million | ▼ -95.5% |
| 2009 | 13.14x | $1.02 Billion | $78.00 Million | ▲ +366.9% |
| 2008 | 2.81x | $470.00 Million | $167.00 Million | ▲ +232.0% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | $195.00 Million | $230.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.85x | $345.00 Million | $407.00 Million | ▲ +15542.9% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | $-11.00 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▼ -101.1% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $190.00 Million | $378.00 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2003 | 5.63x | $529.00 Million | $94.00 Million | ▲ +208.2% |
| 2002 | 1.83x | $210.00 Million | $115.00 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2001 | 2.25x | $915.00 Million | $406.00 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2000 | 6.00x | $444.00 Million | $74.00 Million | ▲ +346.2% |
| 1999 | 1.34x | $390.00 Million | $290.00 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1998 | 1.53x | $311.00 Million | $203.00 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 1997 | 3.65x | $1.05 Billion | $288.00 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 1996 | 3.64x | $767.00 Million | $211.00 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 1995 | 20.83x | $500.00 Million | $24.00 Million | ▲ +804.0% |
| 1994 | 2.30x | $454.00 Million | $197.00 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 1993 | 1.76x | $249.60 Million | $142.20 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 1991 | 3.26x | $473.20 Million | $145.00 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 1990 | 2.04x | $371.10 Million | $182.10 Million | ▲ +106.9% |
| 1989 | 0.98x | $84.90 Million | $86.20 Million | — |