Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.98x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of $122.00 Million exceeds net income of $41.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Ashland Global Holdings Inc debt service capacity to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Ashland Global Holdings Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1989–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Ashland Global Holdings Inc across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Ashland Global Holdings Inc (1989–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.07x | $411.00 Million | $199.00 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2023 | 1.37x | $243.00 Million | $178.00 Million | ▲ +694.1% |
| 2022 | -0.23x | $-213.00 Million | $927.00 Million | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2021 | 2.55x | $560.00 Million | $220.00 Million | ▲ +433.4% |
| 2019 | 0.48x | $241.00 Million | $505.00 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2018 | 2.61x | $297.00 Million | $114.00 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2017 | 13.68x | $383.00 Million | $28.00 Million | ▲ +1169.3% |
| 2015 | 1.08x | $333.00 Million | $309.00 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2014 | 2.76x | $643.00 Million | $233.00 Million | ▲ +157.1% |
| 2013 | 1.07x | $733.00 Million | $683.00 Million | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2012 | 29.50x | $354.00 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +4884.9% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | $245.00 Million | $414.00 Million | ▼ -95.5% |
| 2009 | 13.14x | $1.02 Billion | $78.00 Million | ▲ +366.9% |
| 2008 | 2.81x | $470.00 Million | $167.00 Million | ▲ +232.0% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | $195.00 Million | $230.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.85x | $345.00 Million | $407.00 Million | ▲ +15542.9% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | $-11.00 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▼ -101.1% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $190.00 Million | $378.00 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2003 | 5.63x | $529.00 Million | $94.00 Million | ▲ +208.2% |
| 2002 | 1.83x | $210.00 Million | $115.00 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2001 | 2.25x | $915.00 Million | $406.00 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2000 | 6.00x | $444.00 Million | $74.00 Million | ▲ +346.2% |
| 1999 | 1.34x | $390.00 Million | $290.00 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1998 | 1.53x | $311.00 Million | $203.00 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 1997 | 3.65x | $1.05 Billion | $288.00 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 1996 | 3.64x | $767.00 Million | $211.00 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 1995 | 20.83x | $500.00 Million | $24.00 Million | ▲ +804.0% |
| 1994 | 2.30x | $454.00 Million | $197.00 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 1993 | 1.76x | $249.60 Million | $142.20 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 1991 | 3.26x | $473.20 Million | $145.00 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 1990 | 2.04x | $371.10 Million | $182.10 Million | ▲ +106.9% |
| 1989 | 0.98x | $84.90 Million | $86.20 Million | — |