Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 62.50x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $125.00 Million exceeds net income of $2.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Ashland Global Holdings Inc long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Ashland Global Holdings Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1989–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Ashland Global Holdings Inc across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check tangible net worth ratio of Ashland Global Holdings Inc to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Ashland Global Holdings Inc (1989–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see market value of Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.07x | $411.00 Million | $199.00 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2023 | 1.37x | $243.00 Million | $178.00 Million | ▲ +694.1% |
| 2022 | -0.23x | $-213.00 Million | $927.00 Million | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2021 | 2.55x | $560.00 Million | $220.00 Million | ▲ +433.4% |
| 2019 | 0.48x | $241.00 Million | $505.00 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2018 | 2.61x | $297.00 Million | $114.00 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2017 | 13.68x | $383.00 Million | $28.00 Million | ▲ +1169.3% |
| 2015 | 1.08x | $333.00 Million | $309.00 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2014 | 2.76x | $643.00 Million | $233.00 Million | ▲ +157.1% |
| 2013 | 1.07x | $733.00 Million | $683.00 Million | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2012 | 29.50x | $354.00 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +4884.9% |
| 2011 | 0.59x | $245.00 Million | $414.00 Million | ▼ -95.5% |
| 2009 | 13.14x | $1.02 Billion | $78.00 Million | ▲ +366.9% |
| 2008 | 2.81x | $470.00 Million | $167.00 Million | ▲ +232.0% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | $195.00 Million | $230.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.85x | $345.00 Million | $407.00 Million | ▲ +15542.9% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | $-11.00 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▼ -101.1% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $190.00 Million | $378.00 Million | ▼ -91.1% |
| 2003 | 5.63x | $529.00 Million | $94.00 Million | ▲ +208.2% |
| 2002 | 1.83x | $210.00 Million | $115.00 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2001 | 2.25x | $915.00 Million | $406.00 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2000 | 6.00x | $444.00 Million | $74.00 Million | ▲ +346.2% |
| 1999 | 1.34x | $390.00 Million | $290.00 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1998 | 1.53x | $311.00 Million | $203.00 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 1997 | 3.65x | $1.05 Billion | $288.00 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 1996 | 3.64x | $767.00 Million | $211.00 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 1995 | 20.83x | $500.00 Million | $24.00 Million | ▲ +804.0% |
| 1994 | 2.30x | $454.00 Million | $197.00 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 1993 | 1.76x | $249.60 Million | $142.20 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 1991 | 3.26x | $473.20 Million | $145.00 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 1990 | 2.04x | $371.10 Million | $182.10 Million | ▲ +106.9% |
| 1989 | 0.98x | $84.90 Million | $86.20 Million | — |