Ashland Global Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ashland Global Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $122.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.71 Billion) in one year. Check ASH cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ashland Global Holdings Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ashland Global Holdings Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ashland Global Holdings Inc across 37 annual periods. Check Ashland Global Holdings Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Ashland Global Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Ashland Global Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ashland Global Holdings Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $94.00 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $411.00 Million | $2.78 Billion | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $243.00 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▲ +220.1% |
| 2022 | -0.07x | $-213.00 Million | $2.99 Billion | ▼ -149.1% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $560.00 Million | $3.86 Billion | ▲ +174.5% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $203.00 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $241.00 Million | $3.68 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $297.00 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $383.00 Million | $5.21 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $678.00 Million | $6.83 Billion | ▲ +109.0% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $333.00 Million | $7.02 Billion | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $643.00 Million | $7.37 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $733.00 Million | $7.54 Billion | ▲ +133.4% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $354.00 Million | $8.49 Billion | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $245.00 Million | $8.83 Billion | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $507.00 Million | $5.73 Billion | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $1.02 Billion | $5.86 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $470.00 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▲ +137.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $195.00 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $345.00 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +2861.1% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $-11.00 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $190.00 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $529.00 Million | $4.75 Billion | ▲ +141.3% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $210.00 Million | $4.55 Billion | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $915.00 Million | $4.72 Billion | ▲ +109.9% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $444.00 Million | $4.81 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $390.00 Million | $4.22 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $311.00 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▼ -58.9% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $1.05 Billion | $5.48 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $767.00 Million | $5.28 Billion | ▲ +55.0% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $500.00 Million | $5.34 Billion | ▼ -12.9% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $454.00 Million | $4.22 Billion | ▲ +76.6% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $249.60 Million | $4.10 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | $398.20 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▼ -26.4% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $473.20 Million | $4.01 Billion | ▲ +22.2% |
| 1990 | 0.10x | $371.10 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▲ +277.6% |
| 1989 | 0.03x | $84.90 Million | $3.32 Billion | — |