Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $125.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.64 Billion) in one year. See Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ashland Global Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ashland Global Holdings Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Ashland Global Holdings Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ashland Global Holdings Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ASH market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $94.00 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $411.00 Million | $2.78 Billion | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $243.00 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▲ +220.1% |
| 2022 | -0.07x | $-213.00 Million | $2.99 Billion | ▼ -149.1% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $560.00 Million | $3.86 Billion | ▲ +174.5% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $203.00 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $241.00 Million | $3.68 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $297.00 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $383.00 Million | $5.21 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $678.00 Million | $6.83 Billion | ▲ +109.0% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $333.00 Million | $7.02 Billion | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $643.00 Million | $7.37 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $733.00 Million | $7.54 Billion | ▲ +133.4% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $354.00 Million | $8.49 Billion | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $245.00 Million | $8.83 Billion | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $507.00 Million | $5.73 Billion | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $1.02 Billion | $5.86 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $470.00 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▲ +137.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $195.00 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $345.00 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +2861.1% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $-11.00 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $190.00 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $529.00 Million | $4.75 Billion | ▲ +141.3% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $210.00 Million | $4.55 Billion | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $915.00 Million | $4.72 Billion | ▲ +109.9% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $444.00 Million | $4.81 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $390.00 Million | $4.22 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $311.00 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▼ -58.9% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $1.05 Billion | $5.48 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $767.00 Million | $5.28 Billion | ▲ +55.0% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $500.00 Million | $5.34 Billion | ▼ -12.9% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $454.00 Million | $4.22 Billion | ▲ +76.6% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $249.60 Million | $4.10 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | $398.20 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▼ -26.4% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $473.20 Million | $4.01 Billion | ▲ +22.2% |
| 1990 | 0.10x | $371.10 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▲ +277.6% |
| 1989 | 0.03x | $84.90 Million | $3.32 Billion | — |