Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ashland Global Holdings Inc (ASH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $125.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.64 Billion) in one year. Explore Ashland Global Holdings Inc long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ashland Global Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ashland Global Holdings Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore ASH asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ashland Global Holdings Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ASH stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $94.00 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $411.00 Million | $2.78 Billion | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $243.00 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▲ +220.1% |
| 2022 | -0.07x | $-213.00 Million | $2.99 Billion | ▼ -149.1% |
| 2021 | 0.15x | $560.00 Million | $3.86 Billion | ▲ +174.5% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $203.00 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $241.00 Million | $3.68 Billion | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $297.00 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $383.00 Million | $5.21 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $678.00 Million | $6.83 Billion | ▲ +109.0% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $333.00 Million | $7.02 Billion | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $643.00 Million | $7.37 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $733.00 Million | $7.54 Billion | ▲ +133.4% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $354.00 Million | $8.49 Billion | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $245.00 Million | $8.83 Billion | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $507.00 Million | $5.73 Billion | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $1.02 Billion | $5.86 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $470.00 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▲ +137.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $195.00 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $345.00 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +2861.1% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $-11.00 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $190.00 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $529.00 Million | $4.75 Billion | ▲ +141.3% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $210.00 Million | $4.55 Billion | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $915.00 Million | $4.72 Billion | ▲ +109.9% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $444.00 Million | $4.81 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $390.00 Million | $4.22 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $311.00 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▼ -58.9% |
| 1997 | 0.19x | $1.05 Billion | $5.48 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $767.00 Million | $5.28 Billion | ▲ +55.0% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $500.00 Million | $5.34 Billion | ▼ -12.9% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $454.00 Million | $4.22 Billion | ▲ +76.6% |
| 1993 | 0.06x | $249.60 Million | $4.10 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | $398.20 Million | $4.58 Billion | ▼ -26.4% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $473.20 Million | $4.01 Billion | ▲ +22.2% |
| 1990 | 0.10x | $371.10 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▲ +277.6% |
| 1989 | 0.03x | $84.90 Million | $3.32 Billion | — |