Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund Cash Flow Quality Index
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund cash flow quality index. Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund (EVN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.00x as of May 2026. Operating cash flow of $9.57 Million is below net income of $9.60 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. See Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund (2002–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund from 2002 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund across 20 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore cash flow to debt ratio of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (2002–2025)
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund cash flow quality index by year from 2002 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see EVN operating cash flow.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41.01x | $17.37 Million | $423.47K | ▲ +6648.9% |
| 2024 | 0.61x | $22.35 Million | $36.78 Million | ▼ -88.8% |
| 2023 | 5.40x | $71.80 Million | $13.29 Million | ▲ +256.1% |
| 2021 | 1.52x | $40.70 Million | $26.83 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2020 | 1.06x | $37.63 Million | $35.58 Million | ▲ +276.4% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $17.29 Million | $61.53 Million | ▼ -98.7% |
| 2018 | 22.03x | $43.78 Million | $1.99 Million | ▲ +3412.1% |
| 2017 | 0.63x | $15.10 Million | $24.08 Million | ▼ -88.4% |
| 2016 | 5.42x | $55.62 Million | $10.25 Million | ▲ +1005.9% |
| 2015 | 0.49x | $11.22 Million | $22.88 Million | ▲ +488.2% |
| 2014 | -0.13x | $-9.85 Million | $77.95 Million | ▼ -198.3% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $10.60 Million | $82.46 Million | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2011 | 1.29x | $18.73 Million | $14.57 Million | ▲ +444.9% |
| 2010 | -0.37x | $-10.05 Million | $26.96 Million | ▼ -952.2% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $3.11 Million | $71.10 Million | ▼ -90.3% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $19.61 Million | $43.53 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2005 | 0.92x | $27.60 Million | $30.16 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2004 | 0.92x | $17.60 Million | $19.12 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2003 | 0.96x | $36.63 Million | $38.22 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2002 | 0.88x | $18.34 Million | $20.79 Million | — |