Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund (EVN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund (EVN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.65 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($207.34 Million) in one year. See EVN cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund across 24 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $17.37 Million | $207.34 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $22.35 Million | $195.76 Million | ▼ -71.9% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $71.80 Million | $176.88 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2022 | 0.34x | $79.50 Million | $234.45 Million | ▲ +150.5% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $40.70 Million | $300.65 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $37.63 Million | $306.18 Million | ▲ +127.8% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $17.29 Million | $320.51 Million | ▼ -73.7% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $43.78 Million | $213.03 Million | ▲ +196.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $15.10 Million | $217.95 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $55.62 Million | $217.03 Million | ▲ +258.9% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $11.22 Million | $157.16 Million | ▲ +202.1% |
| 2014 | -0.07x | $-9.85 Million | $140.91 Million | ▼ -129.5% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $26.97 Million | $113.84 Million | ▲ +189.5% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $10.60 Million | $129.50 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $18.73 Million | $130.30 Million | ▲ +283.2% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | $-10.05 Million | $128.10 Million | ▼ -311.4% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $3.11 Million | $83.80 Million | ▼ -97.3% |
| 2008 | 1.40x | $76.63 Million | $54.90 Million | ▲ +161.5% |
| 2007 | 0.53x | $47.18 Million | $88.40 Million | ▲ +192.8% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | $19.61 Million | $107.60 Million | ▼ -94.9% |
| 2005 | 3.58x | $27.60 Million | $7.70 Million | ▼ -79.6% |
| 2004 | 17.60x | $17.60 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -76.0% |
| 2003 | 73.26x | $36.63 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2002 | 30.57x | $18.34 Million | $600.00K | — |