Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund (EVN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund (EVN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $9.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($236.99 Million) in one year. See EVN FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund across 24 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund. Check Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $17.37 Million | $207.34 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $22.35 Million | $195.76 Million | ▼ -71.9% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $71.80 Million | $176.88 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2022 | 0.34x | $79.50 Million | $234.45 Million | ▲ +150.5% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $40.70 Million | $300.65 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $37.63 Million | $306.18 Million | ▲ +127.8% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $17.29 Million | $320.51 Million | ▼ -73.7% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $43.78 Million | $213.03 Million | ▲ +196.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $15.10 Million | $217.95 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $55.62 Million | $217.03 Million | ▲ +258.9% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | $11.22 Million | $157.16 Million | ▲ +202.1% |
| 2014 | -0.07x | $-9.85 Million | $140.91 Million | ▼ -129.5% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $26.97 Million | $113.84 Million | ▲ +189.5% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $10.60 Million | $129.50 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $18.73 Million | $130.30 Million | ▲ +283.2% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | $-10.05 Million | $128.10 Million | ▼ -311.4% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $3.11 Million | $83.80 Million | ▼ -97.3% |
| 2008 | 1.40x | $76.63 Million | $54.90 Million | ▲ +161.5% |
| 2007 | 0.53x | $47.18 Million | $88.40 Million | ▲ +192.8% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | $19.61 Million | $107.60 Million | ▼ -94.9% |
| 2005 | 3.58x | $27.60 Million | $7.70 Million | ▼ -79.6% |
| 2004 | 17.60x | $17.60 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -76.0% |
| 2003 | 73.26x | $36.63 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2002 | 30.57x | $18.34 Million | $600.00K | — |