Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund Net Asset Quality Index
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund net asset quality index. Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund (EVN) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 64.5% as of May 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $668.01 Million minus total liabilities of $236.99 Million yields net assets of $431.03 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See EVN net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund (2002–2025)
Net asset quality index of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund from 2002 to 2025. This chart shows how Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of May 2026, the index stands at 64.5%, representing net assets of $431.03 Million against total assets of $668.01 Million USD. Check EVN strategic assets to equity ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2002–2025)
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund net asset quality index by year from 2002 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Eaton Vance Municipal Income Closed Fund from 2002 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see EVN market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 67.6% | $433.11 Million | $640.45 Million | $207.34 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2024 | 69.9% | $454.92 Million | $650.68 Million | $195.76 Million | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2023 | 71.4% | $440.78 Million | $617.66 Million | $176.88 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2022 | 65.6% | $446.31 Million | $680.76 Million | $234.45 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2021 | 65.2% | $564.42 Million | $865.08 Million | $300.65 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2020 | 64.7% | $560.30 Million | $866.49 Million | $306.18 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2019 | 63.1% | $546.98 Million | $867.50 Million | $320.51 Million | ▲ +4.4 pp |
| 2018 | 58.6% | $302.01 Million | $515.05 Million | $213.03 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2017 | 60.2% | $329.86 Million | $547.81 Million | $217.95 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2016 | 59.7% | $321.91 Million | $538.94 Million | $217.03 Million | ▼ -13.5 pp |
| 2015 | 73.2% | $429.51 Million | $586.67 Million | $157.16 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2014 | 75.2% | $427.23 Million | $568.14 Million | $140.91 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2013 | 76.3% | $366.45 Million | $480.29 Million | $113.84 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2012 | 76.6% | $424.90 Million | $554.40 Million | $129.50 Million | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2011 | 73.6% | $364.10 Million | $494.40 Million | $130.30 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2010 | 74.3% | $370.90 Million | $499.00 Million | $128.10 Million | ▼ -7.0 pp |
| 2009 | 81.3% | $364.00 Million | $447.80 Million | $83.80 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2008 | 82.0% | $250.10 Million | $305.00 Million | $54.90 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2007 | 81.0% | $378.00 Million | $466.40 Million | $88.40 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2006 | 78.9% | $403.30 Million | $510.90 Million | $107.60 Million | ▼ -19.1 pp |
| 2005 | 98.0% | $378.00 Million | $385.70 Million | $7.70 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2004 | 99.7% | $367.40 Million | $368.40 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2003 | 99.9% | $367.60 Million | $368.10 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 99.8% | $347.40 Million | $348.00 Million | $600.00K | — |