Core Molding Technologies Inc Cash Flow Quality Index
Core Molding Technologies Inc cash flow quality index. Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.63x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $5.02 Million exceeds net income of $3.08 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See financial flexibility index of Core Molding Technologies Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Core Molding Technologies Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Core Molding Technologies Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Core Molding Technologies Inc across 26 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore cash flow to debt ratio of Core Molding Technologies Inc to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Core Molding Technologies Inc Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1997–2025)
Core Molding Technologies Inc cash flow quality index by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Core Molding Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Core Molding Technologies Inc.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6.22x | $19.18 Million | $3.08 Million | ▲ +135.4% |
| 2024 | 2.64x | $35.15 Million | $13.30 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2023 | 1.71x | $34.84 Million | $20.32 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2022 | 1.56x | $18.98 Million | $12.20 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2021 | 2.69x | $12.55 Million | $4.67 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2020 | 3.45x | $28.16 Million | $8.16 Million | ▲ +172.4% |
| 2017 | 1.27x | $6.91 Million | $5.46 Million | ▼ -64.0% |
| 2016 | 3.52x | $26.07 Million | $7.41 Million | ▲ +127.7% |
| 2015 | 1.54x | $18.61 Million | $12.05 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2014 | 1.12x | $10.83 Million | $9.63 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2013 | 1.01x | $6.92 Million | $6.87 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2012 | 1.81x | $14.80 Million | $8.19 Million | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2011 | 1.09x | $11.47 Million | $10.53 Million | ▼ -64.0% |
| 2010 | 3.03x | $7.37 Million | $2.43 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 2009 | 8.09x | $8.23 Million | $1.02 Million | ▲ +538.0% |
| 2008 | 1.27x | $7.16 Million | $5.64 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2007 | 3.21x | $11.95 Million | $3.73 Million | ▲ +97.4% |
| 2006 | 1.62x | $16.91 Million | $10.41 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2005 | 1.36x | $8.56 Million | $6.29 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2004 | 1.65x | $8.47 Million | $5.13 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2003 | 2.31x | $3.84 Million | $1.67 Million | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2002 | 2.98x | $5.99 Million | $2.01 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2000 | 4.99x | $3.57 Million | $715.35K | ▼ -78.4% |
| 1999 | 23.08x | $1.65 Million | $71.34K | ▲ +3965.9% |
| 1998 | 0.57x | $2.10 Million | $3.70 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 1997 | 2.11x | $5.70 Million | $2.70 Million | — |