Core Molding Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Core Molding Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($69.96 Million) in one year. Check Core Molding Technologies Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Core Molding Technologies Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Core Molding Technologies Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Core Molding Technologies Inc across 29 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Core Molding Technologies Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Core Molding Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Core Molding Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Core Molding Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Core Molding Technologies Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | $19.18 Million | $69.96 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2024 | 0.57x | $35.15 Million | $62.19 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2023 | 0.47x | $34.84 Million | $74.42 Million | ▲ +103.4% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $18.98 Million | $82.49 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $12.55 Million | $86.60 Million | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2020 | 0.39x | $28.16 Million | $71.58 Million | ▲ +123.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $16.70 Million | $94.88 Million | ▲ +375.8% |
| 2018 | -0.06x | $-6.53 Million | $102.27 Million | ▼ -133.0% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | $6.91 Million | $35.73 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2016 | 0.68x | $26.07 Million | $38.07 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | $18.61 Million | $51.07 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | $10.83 Million | $41.57 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $6.92 Million | $29.67 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $14.80 Million | $33.85 Million | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $11.47 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $7.37 Million | $41.00 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $8.23 Million | $48.94 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $7.16 Million | $44.86 Million | ▼ -46.8% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $11.95 Million | $39.87 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2006 | 0.36x | $16.91 Million | $46.81 Million | ▲ +69.1% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $8.56 Million | $40.08 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $8.47 Million | $42.68 Million | ▲ +82.3% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $3.84 Million | $35.30 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $5.99 Million | $45.11 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $3.36 Million | $43.77 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $3.57 Million | $43.15 Million | ▲ +146.4% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $1.65 Million | $49.06 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $2.10 Million | $46.50 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $5.70 Million | $41.40 Million | — |