Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($69.96 Million) in one year. See CMT financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Core Molding Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Core Molding Technologies Inc across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Core Molding Technologies Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Core Molding Technologies Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Core Molding Technologies Inc. Check cash flow quality index of Core Molding Technologies Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | $19.18 Million | $69.96 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2024 | 0.57x | $35.15 Million | $62.19 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2023 | 0.47x | $34.84 Million | $74.42 Million | ▲ +103.4% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $18.98 Million | $82.49 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $12.55 Million | $86.60 Million | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2020 | 0.39x | $28.16 Million | $71.58 Million | ▲ +123.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $16.70 Million | $94.88 Million | ▲ +375.8% |
| 2018 | -0.06x | $-6.53 Million | $102.27 Million | ▼ -133.0% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | $6.91 Million | $35.73 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2016 | 0.68x | $26.07 Million | $38.07 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | $18.61 Million | $51.07 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | $10.83 Million | $41.57 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $6.92 Million | $29.67 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $14.80 Million | $33.85 Million | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $11.47 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $7.37 Million | $41.00 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $8.23 Million | $48.94 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $7.16 Million | $44.86 Million | ▼ -46.8% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $11.95 Million | $39.87 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2006 | 0.36x | $16.91 Million | $46.81 Million | ▲ +69.1% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $8.56 Million | $40.08 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $8.47 Million | $42.68 Million | ▲ +82.3% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $3.84 Million | $35.30 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $5.99 Million | $45.11 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $3.36 Million | $43.77 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $3.57 Million | $43.15 Million | ▲ +146.4% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $1.65 Million | $49.06 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $2.10 Million | $46.50 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $5.70 Million | $41.40 Million | — |