Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($69.96 Million) in one year. Explore Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Core Molding Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Core Molding Technologies Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Core Molding Technologies Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Core Molding Technologies Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Core Molding Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Core Molding Technologies Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | $19.18 Million | $69.96 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2024 | 0.57x | $35.15 Million | $62.19 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2023 | 0.47x | $34.84 Million | $74.42 Million | ▲ +103.4% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $18.98 Million | $82.49 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $12.55 Million | $86.60 Million | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2020 | 0.39x | $28.16 Million | $71.58 Million | ▲ +123.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $16.70 Million | $94.88 Million | ▲ +375.8% |
| 2018 | -0.06x | $-6.53 Million | $102.27 Million | ▼ -133.0% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | $6.91 Million | $35.73 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2016 | 0.68x | $26.07 Million | $38.07 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2015 | 0.36x | $18.61 Million | $51.07 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | $10.83 Million | $41.57 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $6.92 Million | $29.67 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $14.80 Million | $33.85 Million | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $11.47 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $7.37 Million | $41.00 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $8.23 Million | $48.94 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $7.16 Million | $44.86 Million | ▼ -46.8% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $11.95 Million | $39.87 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2006 | 0.36x | $16.91 Million | $46.81 Million | ▲ +69.1% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $8.56 Million | $40.08 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $8.47 Million | $42.68 Million | ▲ +82.3% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $3.84 Million | $35.30 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $5.99 Million | $45.11 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $3.36 Million | $43.77 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $3.57 Million | $43.15 Million | ▲ +146.4% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $1.65 Million | $49.06 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $2.10 Million | $46.50 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $5.70 Million | $41.40 Million | — |