Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 69.3% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $228.13 Million minus total liabilities of $69.96 Million yields net assets of $158.17 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read Core Molding Technologies Inc balance sheet liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Core Molding Technologies Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2025)
This chart shows how Core Molding Technologies Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 69.3%, representing net assets of $158.17 Million against total assets of $228.13 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see CMT stock market capitalisation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Core Molding Technologies Inc (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Core Molding Technologies Inc from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check CMT PP&E to net assets ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 69.3% | $158.17 Million | $228.13 Million | $69.96 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2024 | 70.3% | $147.36 Million | $209.55 Million | $62.19 Million | ▲ +5.2 pp |
| 2023 | 65.1% | $138.95 Million | $213.38 Million | $74.42 Million | ▲ +6.7 pp |
| 2022 | 58.5% | $116.12 Million | $198.62 Million | $82.49 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2021 | 53.6% | $100.09 Million | $186.69 Million | $86.60 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2020 | 56.8% | $93.93 Million | $165.51 Million | $71.58 Million | ▲ +9.7 pp |
| 2019 | 47.1% | $84.43 Million | $179.31 Million | $94.88 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2018 | 49.2% | $98.93 Million | $201.20 Million | $102.27 Million | ▼ -24.9 pp |
| 2017 | 74.0% | $101.89 Million | $137.62 Million | $35.73 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2016 | 71.8% | $96.77 Million | $134.84 Million | $38.07 Million | ▲ +8.3 pp |
| 2015 | 63.5% | $88.73 Million | $139.80 Million | $51.07 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2014 | 64.7% | $76.15 Million | $117.72 Million | $41.57 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2013 | 69.4% | $67.45 Million | $97.12 Million | $29.67 Million | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2012 | 63.1% | $58.00 Million | $91.85 Million | $33.85 Million | ▲ +9.5 pp |
| 2011 | 53.7% | $50.10 Million | $93.30 Million | $43.20 Million | ▲ +5.5 pp |
| 2010 | 48.1% | $38.06 Million | $79.06 Million | $41.00 Million | ▲ +10.8 pp |
| 2009 | 37.4% | $29.20 Million | $78.14 Million | $48.94 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2008 | 39.2% | $28.98 Million | $73.83 Million | $44.86 Million | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2007 | 35.4% | $21.83 Million | $61.70 Million | $39.87 Million | ▼ -12.3 pp |
| 2006 | 47.7% | $42.69 Million | $89.51 Million | $46.81 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2005 | 46.0% | $34.14 Million | $74.22 Million | $40.08 Million | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 2004 | 38.1% | $26.28 Million | $68.96 Million | $42.68 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2003 | 37.1% | $20.85 Million | $56.15 Million | $35.30 Million | ▲ +7.2 pp |
| 2002 | 29.9% | $19.27 Million | $64.38 Million | $45.11 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2001 | 28.6% | $17.54 Million | $61.30 Million | $43.77 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2000 | 31.3% | $19.64 Million | $62.79 Million | $43.15 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 1999 | 27.8% | $18.92 Million | $67.98 Million | $49.06 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 1998 | 28.9% | $18.90 Million | $65.40 Million | $46.50 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 1997 | 28.0% | $16.10 Million | $57.50 Million | $41.40 Million | — |