Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 3.52x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $510.91K exceeds net income of $145.20K, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore how well can Mesa Royalty Trust service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Mesa Royalty Trust Cash Flow Quality Index (1990–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Mesa Royalty Trust across 33 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Mesa Royalty Trust.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Mesa Royalty Trust (1990–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Mesa Royalty Trust.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.00x | $510.91K | $510.91K | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2024 | 1.16x | $534.96K | $462.96K | ▲ +104.2% |
| 2023 | -27.52x | $-78.62 Million | $2.86 Million | ▲ +62.6% |
| 2022 | -73.67x | $-78.62 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -19872.4% |
| 2021 | 0.37x | $83.64K | $224.48K | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2020 | 1.00x | $565.75K | $565.75K | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.00x | $1.64 Million | $1.64 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.00x | $2.14 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.00x | $2.94 Million | $2.94 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.00x | $1.21 Million | $1.21 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.00x | $1.92 Million | $1.92 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2014 | 1.00x | $6.53 Million | $6.53 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.00x | $6.51 Million | $6.51 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2009 | 1.00x | $3.84 Million | $3.84 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2008 | 1.00x | $12.22 Million | $12.22 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.00x | $12.22 Million | $12.22 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | $9.77 Million | $9.77 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2005 | 1.09x | $11.52 Million | $10.52 Million | ▲ +1770.0% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-577.74K | $8.81 Million | ▼ -376.8% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-127.38K | $9.27 Million | ▲ +91.6% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | $-787.83K | $4.81 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2001 | -0.09x | $-996.64K | $10.57 Million | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2000 | 1.12x | $9.01 Million | $8.03 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 1999 | 1.12x | $6.18 Million | $5.50 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 1998 | 0.83x | $5.18 Million | $6.25 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 1997 | 1.06x | $9.89 Million | $9.36 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 1996 | 1.06x | $8.16 Million | $7.69 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 1995 | 0.97x | $5.79 Million | $5.96 Million | ▼ -69.1% |
| 1994 | 3.14x | $22.00 Million | $7.00 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 1993 | 4.12x | $24.30 Million | $5.90 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 1992 | 8.80x | $26.40 Million | $3.00 Million | ▲ +4495.6% |
| 1991 | 0.19x | $900.00K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 1990 | 0.20x | $1.10 Million | $5.50 Million | — |