Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.00x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $510.91K exceeds net income of $510.91K, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore MTR long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Mesa Royalty Trust Cash Flow Quality Index (1990–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Mesa Royalty Trust across 33 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check MTR tangible net assets ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Mesa Royalty Trust (1990–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Mesa Royalty Trust. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Mesa Royalty Trust stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.00x | $510.91K | $510.91K | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2024 | 1.16x | $534.96K | $462.96K | ▲ +104.2% |
| 2023 | -27.52x | $-78.62 Million | $2.86 Million | ▲ +62.6% |
| 2022 | -73.67x | $-78.62 Million | $1.07 Million | ▼ -19872.4% |
| 2021 | 0.37x | $83.64K | $224.48K | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2020 | 1.00x | $565.75K | $565.75K | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.00x | $1.64 Million | $1.64 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.00x | $2.14 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.00x | $2.94 Million | $2.94 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.00x | $1.21 Million | $1.21 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.00x | $1.92 Million | $1.92 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2014 | 1.00x | $6.53 Million | $6.53 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.00x | $6.51 Million | $6.51 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2009 | 1.00x | $3.84 Million | $3.84 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2008 | 1.00x | $12.22 Million | $12.22 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.00x | $12.22 Million | $12.22 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | $9.77 Million | $9.77 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2005 | 1.09x | $11.52 Million | $10.52 Million | ▲ +1770.0% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-577.74K | $8.81 Million | ▼ -376.8% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-127.38K | $9.27 Million | ▲ +91.6% |
| 2002 | -0.16x | $-787.83K | $4.81 Million | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2001 | -0.09x | $-996.64K | $10.57 Million | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2000 | 1.12x | $9.01 Million | $8.03 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 1999 | 1.12x | $6.18 Million | $5.50 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 1998 | 0.83x | $5.18 Million | $6.25 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 1997 | 1.06x | $9.89 Million | $9.36 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 1996 | 1.06x | $8.16 Million | $7.69 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 1995 | 0.97x | $5.79 Million | $5.96 Million | ▼ -69.1% |
| 1994 | 3.14x | $22.00 Million | $7.00 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 1993 | 4.12x | $24.30 Million | $5.90 Million | ▼ -53.2% |
| 1992 | 8.80x | $26.40 Million | $3.00 Million | ▲ +4495.6% |
| 1991 | 0.19x | $900.00K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 1990 | 0.20x | $1.10 Million | $5.50 Million | — |