Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($3.15 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See MTR total equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Mesa Royalty Trust Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1995–2025)
This chart shows how Mesa Royalty Trust's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 30 annual periods from 1995 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $3.15 Million with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. Also explore Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mesa Royalty Trust (1995–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Mesa Royalty Trust from 1995 to 2025, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Mesa Royalty Trust market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $3.16 Million | $0.00 | $3.29 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | $3.13 Million | $0.00 | $3.19 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $3.04 Million | $0.00 | $3.41 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $2.69 Million | $0.00 | $3.75 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | $2.50 Million | $0.00 | $2.74 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | $2.58 Million | $0.00 | $2.84 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | $2.79 Million | $0.00 | $3.36 Million | ▲ +63.9 pp |
| 2017 | 36.1% | $3.10 Million | $1.98 Million | $3.78 Million | ▲ +7.1 pp |
| 2016 | 29.1% | $3.44 Million | $2.44 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2015 | 26.6% | $3.73 Million | $2.73 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2014 | 24.9% | $4.01 Million | $3.01 Million | $5.13 Million | ▼ -75.1 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $4.73 Million | $0.00 | $5.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $5.48 Million | $0.00 | $6.32 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $6.09 Million | $0.00 | $7.44 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | $5.56 Million | $0.00 | $6.95 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $6.39 Million | $0.00 | $7.58 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $7.69 Million | $0.00 | $11.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $7.69 Million | $0.00 | $11.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $8.10 Million | $0.00 | $9.83 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $8.51 Million | $0.00 | $11.91 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $9.02 Million | $0.00 | $11.32 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $9.51 Million | $0.00 | $11.71 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $10.03 Million | $0.00 | $11.43 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $10.84 Million | $0.00 | $12.04 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $11.85 Million | $0.00 | $14.55 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $12.66 Million | $0.00 | $14.36 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $13.89 Million | $0.00 | $14.90 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $15.51 Million | $0.00 | $17.62 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $17.38 Million | $0.00 | $18.98 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $19.62 Million | $0.00 | $20.72 Million | — |