Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 4.12x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $510.91K could theoretically repay 4% of its total liabilities ($123.97K) in one year. See MTR free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mesa Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mesa Royalty Trust across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Mesa Royalty Trust.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mesa Royalty Trust (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mesa Royalty Trust. Check earnings quality score of Mesa Royalty Trust to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4.12x | $510.91K | $123.97K | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2024 | 9.21x | $534.96K | $58.10K | ▲ +104.3% |
| 2023 | -214.48x | $-78.62 Million | $366.56K | ▼ -188.9% |
| 2022 | -74.25x | $-78.62 Million | $1.06 Million | ▼ -21581.0% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $83.64K | $241.98K | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $565.75K | $2.59 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2019 | 6.39x | $1.64 Million | $255.85K | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2018 | 3.77x | $2.14 Million | $566.52K | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2017 | 4.31x | $2.94 Million | $681.94K | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2016 | 2.01x | $1.21 Million | $604.11K | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2015 | 4.61x | $1.92 Million | $415.15K | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2014 | 5.85x | $6.53 Million | $1.12 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2011 | 4.82x | $6.51 Million | $1.35 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2009 | 3.21x | $3.84 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2008 | 3.21x | $12.22 Million | $3.81 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.21x | $12.22 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2006 | 5.64x | $9.77 Million | $1.73 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2005 | 3.39x | $11.52 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +1451.7% |
| 2004 | -0.25x | $-577.74K | $2.31 Million | ▼ -332.8% |
| 2003 | -0.06x | $-127.38K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +89.7% |
| 2002 | -0.56x | $-787.83K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2001 | -0.83x | $-996.64K | $1.20 Million | ▼ -124.9% |
| 2000 | 3.34x | $9.01 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 1999 | 3.64x | $6.18 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 1998 | 5.11x | $5.18 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 1997 | 4.70x | $9.89 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1996 | 5.10x | $8.16 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 1995 | 5.26x | $5.79 Million | $1.10 Million | — |