Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 4.12x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $510.91K could theoretically repay 4% of its total liabilities ($123.97K) in one year. Explore MTR strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mesa Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mesa Royalty Trust across 28 annual periods. Also explore Mesa Royalty Trust total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mesa Royalty Trust (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mesa Royalty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MTR market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4.12x | $510.91K | $123.97K | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2024 | 9.21x | $534.96K | $58.10K | ▲ +104.3% |
| 2023 | -214.48x | $-78.62 Million | $366.56K | ▼ -188.9% |
| 2022 | -74.25x | $-78.62 Million | $1.06 Million | ▼ -21581.0% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $83.64K | $241.98K | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $565.75K | $2.59 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2019 | 6.39x | $1.64 Million | $255.85K | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2018 | 3.77x | $2.14 Million | $566.52K | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2017 | 4.31x | $2.94 Million | $681.94K | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2016 | 2.01x | $1.21 Million | $604.11K | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2015 | 4.61x | $1.92 Million | $415.15K | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2014 | 5.85x | $6.53 Million | $1.12 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2011 | 4.82x | $6.51 Million | $1.35 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2009 | 3.21x | $3.84 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2008 | 3.21x | $12.22 Million | $3.81 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.21x | $12.22 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2006 | 5.64x | $9.77 Million | $1.73 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2005 | 3.39x | $11.52 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +1451.7% |
| 2004 | -0.25x | $-577.74K | $2.31 Million | ▼ -332.8% |
| 2003 | -0.06x | $-127.38K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +89.7% |
| 2002 | -0.56x | $-787.83K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2001 | -0.83x | $-996.64K | $1.20 Million | ▼ -124.9% |
| 2000 | 3.34x | $9.01 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 1999 | 3.64x | $6.18 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 1998 | 5.11x | $5.18 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 1997 | 4.70x | $9.89 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1996 | 5.10x | $8.16 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 1995 | 5.26x | $5.79 Million | $1.10 Million | — |