Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 4.12x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $510.91K could theoretically repay 4% of its total liabilities ($123.97K) in one year. See how much free cash does Mesa Royalty Trust generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mesa Royalty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mesa Royalty Trust across 28 annual periods. Also explore MTR net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mesa Royalty Trust (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mesa Royalty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MTR stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4.12x | $510.91K | $123.97K | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2024 | 9.21x | $534.96K | $58.10K | ▲ +104.3% |
| 2023 | -214.48x | $-78.62 Million | $366.56K | ▼ -188.9% |
| 2022 | -74.25x | $-78.62 Million | $1.06 Million | ▼ -21581.0% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $83.64K | $241.98K | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2020 | 0.22x | $565.75K | $2.59 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2019 | 6.39x | $1.64 Million | $255.85K | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2018 | 3.77x | $2.14 Million | $566.52K | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2017 | 4.31x | $2.94 Million | $681.94K | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2016 | 2.01x | $1.21 Million | $604.11K | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2015 | 4.61x | $1.92 Million | $415.15K | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2014 | 5.85x | $6.53 Million | $1.12 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2011 | 4.82x | $6.51 Million | $1.35 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2009 | 3.21x | $3.84 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2008 | 3.21x | $12.22 Million | $3.81 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.21x | $12.22 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2006 | 5.64x | $9.77 Million | $1.73 Million | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2005 | 3.39x | $11.52 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +1451.7% |
| 2004 | -0.25x | $-577.74K | $2.31 Million | ▼ -332.8% |
| 2003 | -0.06x | $-127.38K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +89.7% |
| 2002 | -0.56x | $-787.83K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2001 | -0.83x | $-996.64K | $1.20 Million | ▼ -124.9% |
| 2000 | 3.34x | $9.01 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 1999 | 3.64x | $6.18 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -28.9% |
| 1998 | 5.11x | $5.18 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 1997 | 4.70x | $9.89 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1996 | 5.10x | $8.16 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 1995 | 5.26x | $5.79 Million | $1.10 Million | — |