Mesa Royalty Trust Net Asset Quality Index
Mesa Royalty Trust net asset quality index. Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 94.6% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $3.33 Million minus total liabilities of $180.62K yields net assets of $3.15 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See MTR book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Mesa Royalty Trust (1995–2025)
Net asset quality index of Mesa Royalty Trust from 1995 to 2025. This chart shows how Mesa Royalty Trust's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 31 annual periods from 1995 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 94.6%, representing net assets of $3.15 Million against total assets of $3.33 Million USD. Check strategic asset allocation of Mesa Royalty Trust to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Mesa Royalty Trust Net Asset Quality Index by Year (1995–2025)
Mesa Royalty Trust net asset quality index by year from 1995 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Mesa Royalty Trust from 1995 to 2025, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 96.2% | $3.16 Million | $3.29 Million | $123.97K | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2024 | 98.2% | $3.13 Million | $3.19 Million | $58.10K | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2023 | 89.2% | $3.04 Million | $3.41 Million | $366.56K | ▲ +17.5 pp |
| 2022 | 71.8% | $2.69 Million | $3.75 Million | $1.06 Million | ▼ -19.4 pp |
| 2021 | 91.2% | $2.50 Million | $2.74 Million | $241.98K | ▲ +91.2 pp |
| 2020 | 0.0% | $0.00 | $2.59 Million | $2.59 Million | ▼ -91.0 pp |
| 2019 | 91.0% | $2.58 Million | $2.84 Million | $255.85K | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 2018 | 83.1% | $2.79 Million | $3.36 Million | $566.52K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2017 | 82.0% | $3.10 Million | $3.78 Million | $681.94K | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2016 | 85.1% | $3.44 Million | $4.04 Million | $604.11K | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2015 | 90.0% | $3.73 Million | $4.14 Million | $415.15K | ▲ +11.8 pp |
| 2014 | 78.2% | $4.01 Million | $5.13 Million | $1.12 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2013 | 83.4% | $4.73 Million | $5.67 Million | $939.25K | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2012 | 86.9% | $5.48 Million | $6.32 Million | $830.39K | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2011 | 81.8% | $6.09 Million | $7.44 Million | $1.35 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2010 | 80.0% | $5.56 Million | $6.95 Million | $1.39 Million | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2009 | 84.2% | $6.39 Million | $7.58 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +17.4 pp |
| 2008 | 66.9% | $7.69 Million | $11.50 Million | $3.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 66.9% | $7.69 Million | $11.50 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -15.5 pp |
| 2006 | 82.4% | $8.10 Million | $9.83 Million | $1.73 Million | ▲ +10.9 pp |
| 2005 | 71.4% | $8.51 Million | $11.91 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 2004 | 79.6% | $9.02 Million | $11.32 Million | $2.31 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2003 | 81.2% | $9.51 Million | $11.71 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -6.5 pp |
| 2002 | 87.8% | $10.03 Million | $11.43 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2001 | 90.0% | $10.84 Million | $12.04 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +8.6 pp |
| 2000 | 81.4% | $11.85 Million | $14.55 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 1999 | 88.2% | $12.66 Million | $14.36 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 1998 | 93.2% | $13.89 Million | $14.90 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 1997 | 88.1% | $15.51 Million | $17.62 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 1996 | 91.6% | $17.38 Million | $18.98 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 1995 | 94.7% | $19.62 Million | $20.72 Million | $1.10 Million | — |