Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) — Net Asset Quality Index
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 100.0% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $3.29 Billion minus total liabilities of $123.97K yields net assets of $3.29 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) asset resilience to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Mesa Royalty Trust Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1995–2025)
This chart shows how Mesa Royalty Trust's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 31 annual periods from 1995 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 100.0%, representing net assets of $3.29 Billion against total assets of $3.29 Billion USD. See Mesa Royalty Trust working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Mesa Royalty Trust (1995–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Mesa Royalty Trust from 1995 to 2025, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see MTR market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $3.29 Billion | $3.29 Billion | $123.97K | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2024 | 98.2% | $3.13 Million | $3.19 Million | $58.10K | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2023 | 89.2% | $3.04 Million | $3.41 Million | $366.56K | ▲ +17.5 pp |
| 2022 | 71.8% | $2.69 Million | $3.75 Million | $1.06 Million | ▼ -19.4 pp |
| 2021 | 91.2% | $2.50 Million | $2.74 Million | $241.98K | ▲ +91.2 pp |
| 2020 | 0.0% | $0.00 | $2.59 Million | $2.59 Million | ▼ -91.0 pp |
| 2019 | 91.0% | $2.58 Million | $2.84 Million | $255.85K | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 2018 | 83.1% | $2.79 Million | $3.36 Million | $566.52K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2017 | 82.0% | $3.10 Million | $3.78 Million | $681.94K | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2016 | 85.1% | $3.44 Million | $4.04 Million | $604.11K | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2015 | 90.0% | $3.73 Million | $4.14 Million | $415.15K | ▲ +11.8 pp |
| 2014 | 78.2% | $4.01 Million | $5.13 Million | $1.12 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2013 | 83.4% | $4.73 Million | $5.67 Million | $939.25K | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2012 | 86.9% | $5.48 Million | $6.32 Million | $830.39K | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2011 | 81.8% | $6.09 Million | $7.44 Million | $1.35 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2010 | 80.0% | $5.56 Million | $6.95 Million | $1.39 Million | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2009 | 84.2% | $6.39 Million | $7.58 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +17.4 pp |
| 2008 | 66.9% | $7.69 Million | $11.50 Million | $3.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 66.9% | $7.69 Million | $11.50 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -15.5 pp |
| 2006 | 82.4% | $8.10 Million | $9.83 Million | $1.73 Million | ▲ +10.9 pp |
| 2005 | 71.4% | $8.51 Million | $11.91 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 2004 | 79.6% | $9.02 Million | $11.32 Million | $2.31 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2003 | 81.2% | $9.51 Million | $11.71 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -6.5 pp |
| 2002 | 87.8% | $10.03 Million | $11.43 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2001 | 90.0% | $10.84 Million | $12.04 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +8.6 pp |
| 2000 | 81.4% | $11.85 Million | $14.55 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 1999 | 88.2% | $12.66 Million | $14.36 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 1998 | 93.2% | $13.89 Million | $14.90 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 1997 | 88.1% | $15.51 Million | $17.62 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 1996 | 91.6% | $17.38 Million | $18.98 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 1995 | 94.7% | $19.62 Million | $20.72 Million | $1.10 Million | — |