Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) — Net Asset Quality Index
Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 94.6% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $3.33 Million minus total liabilities of $180.62K yields net assets of $3.15 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Mesa Royalty Trust defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Mesa Royalty Trust Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1995–2025)
This chart shows how Mesa Royalty Trust's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 31 annual periods from 1995 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 94.6%, representing net assets of $3.15 Million against total assets of $3.33 Million USD. Explore Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Mesa Royalty Trust (1995–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Mesa Royalty Trust from 1995 to 2025, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Mesa Royalty Trust stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 96.2% | $3.16 Million | $3.29 Million | $123.97K | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2024 | 98.2% | $3.13 Million | $3.19 Million | $58.10K | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2023 | 89.2% | $3.04 Million | $3.41 Million | $366.56K | ▲ +17.5 pp |
| 2022 | 71.8% | $2.69 Million | $3.75 Million | $1.06 Million | ▼ -19.4 pp |
| 2021 | 91.2% | $2.50 Million | $2.74 Million | $241.98K | ▲ +91.2 pp |
| 2020 | 0.0% | $0.00 | $2.59 Million | $2.59 Million | ▼ -91.0 pp |
| 2019 | 91.0% | $2.58 Million | $2.84 Million | $255.85K | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 2018 | 83.1% | $2.79 Million | $3.36 Million | $566.52K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2017 | 82.0% | $3.10 Million | $3.78 Million | $681.94K | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2016 | 85.1% | $3.44 Million | $4.04 Million | $604.11K | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2015 | 90.0% | $3.73 Million | $4.14 Million | $415.15K | ▲ +11.8 pp |
| 2014 | 78.2% | $4.01 Million | $5.13 Million | $1.12 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2013 | 83.4% | $4.73 Million | $5.67 Million | $939.25K | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2012 | 86.9% | $5.48 Million | $6.32 Million | $830.39K | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2011 | 81.8% | $6.09 Million | $7.44 Million | $1.35 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2010 | 80.0% | $5.56 Million | $6.95 Million | $1.39 Million | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2009 | 84.2% | $6.39 Million | $7.58 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +17.4 pp |
| 2008 | 66.9% | $7.69 Million | $11.50 Million | $3.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 66.9% | $7.69 Million | $11.50 Million | $3.81 Million | ▼ -15.5 pp |
| 2006 | 82.4% | $8.10 Million | $9.83 Million | $1.73 Million | ▲ +10.9 pp |
| 2005 | 71.4% | $8.51 Million | $11.91 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 2004 | 79.6% | $9.02 Million | $11.32 Million | $2.31 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2003 | 81.2% | $9.51 Million | $11.71 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -6.5 pp |
| 2002 | 87.8% | $10.03 Million | $11.43 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2001 | 90.0% | $10.84 Million | $12.04 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +8.6 pp |
| 2000 | 81.4% | $11.85 Million | $14.55 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 1999 | 88.2% | $12.66 Million | $14.36 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 1998 | 93.2% | $13.89 Million | $14.90 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 1997 | 88.1% | $15.51 Million | $17.62 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 1996 | 91.6% | $17.38 Million | $18.98 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 1995 | 94.7% | $19.62 Million | $20.72 Million | $1.10 Million | — |