Portland General Electric Co (POR) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Portland General Electric Co (POR) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 3.24x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of $220.00 Million exceeds net income of $68.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Portland General Electric Co cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Portland General Electric Co Cash Flow Quality Index (1994–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Portland General Electric Co across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Portland General Electric Co cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Portland General Electric Co (1994–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Portland General Electric Co.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3.65x | $1.12 Billion | $306.00 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2024 | 2.49x | $778.00 Million | $313.00 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2023 | 1.84x | $420.00 Million | $228.00 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2022 | 2.89x | $674.00 Million | $233.00 Million | ▲ +32.7% |
| 2021 | 2.18x | $532.00 Million | $244.00 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2020 | 3.66x | $567.00 Million | $155.00 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2019 | 2.55x | $546.00 Million | $214.00 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2018 | 2.97x | $630.00 Million | $212.00 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2017 | 3.19x | $597.00 Million | $187.00 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2016 | 2.87x | $553.00 Million | $193.00 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2015 | 3.01x | $517.00 Million | $172.00 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2014 | 2.96x | $518.00 Million | $175.00 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2013 | 5.18x | $544.00 Million | $105.00 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2012 | 3.50x | $494.00 Million | $141.00 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2011 | 3.08x | $453.00 Million | $147.00 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2010 | 3.13x | $391.00 Million | $125.00 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2009 | 4.06x | $386.00 Million | $95.00 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2008 | 2.10x | $183.00 Million | $87.00 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2007 | 2.37x | $344.00 Million | $145.00 Million | ▲ +58.9% |
| 2006 | 1.49x | $106.00 Million | $71.00 Million | ▼ -74.3% |
| 2005 | 5.81x | $372.00 Million | $64.00 Million | ▲ +57.3% |
| 2004 | 3.70x | $340.00 Million | $92.00 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2003 | 5.29x | $307.00 Million | $58.00 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2002 | 4.52x | $298.00 Million | $66.00 Million | ▲ +329.1% |
| 2001 | -1.97x | $-67.00 Million | $34.00 Million | ▼ -165.5% |
| 2000 | 3.01x | $424.00 Million | $141.00 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 1999 | 1.84x | $236.00 Million | $128.00 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 1998 | 1.93x | $265.00 Million | $137.00 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 1997 | 2.85x | $359.00 Million | $126.00 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 1996 | 2.67x | $345.75 Million | $129.54 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 1995 | 3.17x | $256.54 Million | $81.04 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 1994 | 2.70x | $251.00 Million | $93.06 Million | — |