Portland General Electric Co (POR) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Portland General Electric Co (POR) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 5.96x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of $268.00 Million exceeds net income of $45.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore cash efficiency ratio of Portland General Electric Co to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Portland General Electric Co Cash Flow Quality Index (1994–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Portland General Electric Co across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check total reinvestment intensity of Portland General Electric Co to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Portland General Electric Co (1994–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Portland General Electric Co. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see POR company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3.65x | $1.12 Billion | $306.00 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2024 | 2.49x | $778.00 Million | $313.00 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2023 | 1.84x | $420.00 Million | $228.00 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2022 | 2.89x | $674.00 Million | $233.00 Million | ▲ +32.7% |
| 2021 | 2.18x | $532.00 Million | $244.00 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2020 | 3.66x | $567.00 Million | $155.00 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2019 | 2.55x | $546.00 Million | $214.00 Million | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2018 | 2.97x | $630.00 Million | $212.00 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2017 | 3.19x | $597.00 Million | $187.00 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2016 | 2.87x | $553.00 Million | $193.00 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2015 | 3.01x | $517.00 Million | $172.00 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2014 | 2.96x | $518.00 Million | $175.00 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2013 | 5.18x | $544.00 Million | $105.00 Million | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2012 | 3.50x | $494.00 Million | $141.00 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2011 | 3.08x | $453.00 Million | $147.00 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2010 | 3.13x | $391.00 Million | $125.00 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2009 | 4.06x | $386.00 Million | $95.00 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2008 | 2.10x | $183.00 Million | $87.00 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2007 | 2.37x | $344.00 Million | $145.00 Million | ▲ +58.9% |
| 2006 | 1.49x | $106.00 Million | $71.00 Million | ▼ -74.3% |
| 2005 | 5.81x | $372.00 Million | $64.00 Million | ▲ +57.3% |
| 2004 | 3.70x | $340.00 Million | $92.00 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2003 | 5.29x | $307.00 Million | $58.00 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2002 | 4.52x | $298.00 Million | $66.00 Million | ▲ +329.1% |
| 2001 | -1.97x | $-67.00 Million | $34.00 Million | ▼ -165.5% |
| 2000 | 3.01x | $424.00 Million | $141.00 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 1999 | 1.84x | $236.00 Million | $128.00 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 1998 | 1.93x | $265.00 Million | $137.00 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 1997 | 2.85x | $359.00 Million | $126.00 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 1996 | 2.67x | $345.75 Million | $129.54 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 1995 | 3.17x | $256.54 Million | $81.04 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 1994 | 2.70x | $251.00 Million | $93.06 Million | — |