Portland General Electric Co (POR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Portland General Electric Co (POR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $220.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.52 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Portland General Electric Co to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Portland General Electric Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Portland General Electric Co across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Portland General Electric Co.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Portland General Electric Co (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Portland General Electric Co. Check POR cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $1.12 Billion | $9.38 Billion | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $778.00 Million | $8.75 Billion | ▲ +67.0% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $420.00 Million | $7.89 Billion | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $674.00 Million | $7.68 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $532.00 Million | $6.79 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $567.00 Million | $6.46 Billion | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $546.00 Million | $5.80 Billion | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $630.00 Million | $5.60 Billion | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $597.00 Million | $5.42 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $553.00 Million | $5.18 Billion | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $517.00 Million | $4.96 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $518.00 Million | $5.13 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $544.00 Million | $4.28 Billion | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $494.00 Million | $3.94 Billion | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $453.00 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $391.00 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $386.00 Million | $3.63 Billion | ▲ +113.3% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $183.00 Million | $3.67 Billion | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $344.00 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▲ +195.6% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $106.00 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $372.00 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | $340.00 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $307.00 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $298.00 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▲ +599.5% |
| 2001 | -0.03x | $-67.00 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▼ -115.6% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | $424.00 Million | $2.35 Billion | ▲ +62.3% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $236.00 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▼ -9.3% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | $265.00 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $359.00 Million | $2.35 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $345.75 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +31.8% |
| 1995 | 0.10x | $256.54 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▲ +8.1% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $251.00 Million | $2.70 Billion | — |