Loblaw Companies Limited Cash Flow Quality Index
Loblaw Companies Limited cash flow quality index. Loblaw Companies Limited (L) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.27x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of CA$1.63 Billion exceeds net income of CA$720.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See financial flexibility index of Loblaw Companies Limited to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Loblaw Companies Limited (1996–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Loblaw Companies Limited from 1996 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Loblaw Companies Limited across 29 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore Loblaw Companies Limited cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Loblaw Companies Limited Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1996–2025)
Loblaw Companies Limited cash flow quality index by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Loblaw Companies Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Loblaw Companies Limited.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.30x | CA$5.81 Billion | CA$2.53 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2024 | 2.55x | CA$5.80 Billion | CA$2.27 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2023 | 2.59x | CA$5.65 Billion | CA$2.19 Billion | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2022 | 2.38x | CA$4.75 Billion | CA$1.99 Billion | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2021 | 2.44x | CA$4.83 Billion | CA$1.98 Billion | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2020 | 4.35x | CA$5.19 Billion | CA$1.19 Billion | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2019 | 3.50x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$1.13 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2018 | 3.13x | CA$2.50 Billion | CA$800.00 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 2017 | 2.08x | CA$3.21 Billion | CA$1.54 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2016 | 3.55x | CA$3.52 Billion | CA$990.00 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2015 | 5.23x | CA$3.08 Billion | CA$589.00 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2014 | 48.47x | CA$2.57 Billion | CA$53.00 Million | ▲ +1938.3% |
| 2013 | 2.38x | CA$1.49 Billion | CA$627.00 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2012 | 2.58x | CA$1.64 Billion | CA$634.00 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2011 | 2.36x | CA$1.81 Billion | CA$769.00 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2010 | 2.36x | CA$1.59 Billion | CA$675.00 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2009 | 2.92x | CA$1.95 Billion | CA$667.00 Million | ▲ +65.1% |
| 2008 | 1.77x | CA$989.00 Million | CA$560.00 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2007 | 3.73x | CA$1.25 Billion | CA$334.00 Million | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2005 | 1.99x | CA$1.49 Billion | CA$749.00 Million | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2004 | 1.49x | CA$1.44 Billion | CA$968.00 Million | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2003 | 1.22x | CA$1.03 Billion | CA$845.00 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2002 | 1.35x | CA$981.00 Million | CA$728.00 Million | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2001 | 1.47x | CA$825.00 Million | CA$563.00 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2000 | 1.66x | CA$785.00 Million | CA$473.00 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1999 | 1.74x | CA$656.00 Million | CA$376.00 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 1998 | 2.05x | CA$534.00 Million | CA$261.00 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 1997 | 2.00x | CA$426.00 Million | CA$213.00 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 1996 | 1.51x | CA$261.90 Million | CA$174.00 Million | — |