Loblaw Companies Limited (L) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Loblaw Companies Limited (L) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.21 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$30.56 Billion) in one year. See L free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Loblaw Companies Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Loblaw Companies Limited across 30 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Loblaw Companies Limited to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Loblaw Companies Limited (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Loblaw Companies Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Loblaw Companies Limited market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | CA$5.81 Billion | CA$30.39 Billion | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | CA$5.80 Billion | CA$29.61 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | CA$5.65 Billion | CA$27.36 Billion | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | CA$4.75 Billion | CA$26.69 Billion | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CA$4.83 Billion | CA$24.88 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | CA$5.19 Billion | CA$24.75 Billion | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$24.99 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | CA$2.50 Billion | CA$17.98 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$3.21 Billion | CA$22.01 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | CA$3.52 Billion | CA$21.41 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | CA$3.08 Billion | CA$21.23 Billion | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | CA$2.57 Billion | CA$20.97 Billion | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | CA$1.49 Billion | CA$13.74 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | CA$1.64 Billion | CA$11.54 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2011 | 0.16x | CA$1.81 Billion | CA$11.42 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | CA$1.59 Billion | CA$11.24 Billion | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | CA$1.95 Billion | CA$8.69 Billion | ▲ +83.8% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | CA$989.00 Million | CA$8.12 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | CA$1.25 Billion | CA$8.11 Billion | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | CA$1.18 Billion | CA$8.03 Billion | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | CA$1.49 Billion | CA$7.86 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | CA$1.44 Billion | CA$7.54 Billion | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | CA$1.03 Billion | CA$7.47 Billion | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | CA$981.00 Million | CA$6.99 Billion | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | CA$825.00 Million | CA$6.44 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$785.00 Million | CA$5.82 Billion | ▲ +4.3% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | CA$656.00 Million | CA$5.08 Billion | ▲ +9.2% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | CA$534.00 Million | CA$4.51 Billion | ▼ -30.0% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | CA$426.00 Million | CA$2.52 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 1996 | 0.12x | CA$261.90 Million | CA$2.22 Billion | — |