Loblaw Companies Limited (L) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Loblaw Companies Limited (L) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.21 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$30.56 Billion) in one year. Explore Loblaw Companies Limited (L) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Loblaw Companies Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Loblaw Companies Limited across 30 annual periods. Also explore Loblaw Companies Limited assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Loblaw Companies Limited (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Loblaw Companies Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Loblaw Companies Limited.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | CA$5.81 Billion | CA$30.39 Billion | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | CA$5.80 Billion | CA$29.61 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | CA$5.65 Billion | CA$27.36 Billion | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | CA$4.75 Billion | CA$26.69 Billion | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CA$4.83 Billion | CA$24.88 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | CA$5.19 Billion | CA$24.75 Billion | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$24.99 Billion | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | CA$2.50 Billion | CA$17.98 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$3.21 Billion | CA$22.01 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | CA$3.52 Billion | CA$21.41 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | CA$3.08 Billion | CA$21.23 Billion | ▲ +18.4% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | CA$2.57 Billion | CA$20.97 Billion | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | CA$1.49 Billion | CA$13.74 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | CA$1.64 Billion | CA$11.54 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2011 | 0.16x | CA$1.81 Billion | CA$11.42 Billion | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | CA$1.59 Billion | CA$11.24 Billion | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | CA$1.95 Billion | CA$8.69 Billion | ▲ +83.8% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | CA$989.00 Million | CA$8.12 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | CA$1.25 Billion | CA$8.11 Billion | ▲ +4.5% |
| 2006 | 0.15x | CA$1.18 Billion | CA$8.03 Billion | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | CA$1.49 Billion | CA$7.86 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | CA$1.44 Billion | CA$7.54 Billion | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | CA$1.03 Billion | CA$7.47 Billion | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | CA$981.00 Million | CA$6.99 Billion | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | CA$825.00 Million | CA$6.44 Billion | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$785.00 Million | CA$5.82 Billion | ▲ +4.3% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | CA$656.00 Million | CA$5.08 Billion | ▲ +9.2% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | CA$534.00 Million | CA$4.51 Billion | ▼ -30.0% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | CA$426.00 Million | CA$2.52 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 1996 | 0.12x | CA$261.90 Million | CA$2.22 Billion | — |