RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN) — Cash Flow Quality Index
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.12x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of CA$169.78 Million exceeds net income of CA$151.24 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust debt service capacity to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow Quality Index (1995–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust across 30 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see REI-UN cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (1995–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6.26x | CA$434.07 Million | CA$69.30 Million | ▲ +684.0% |
| 2024 | 0.80x | CA$378.28 Million | CA$473.46 Million | ▼ -92.0% |
| 2023 | 9.94x | CA$385.52 Million | CA$38.80 Million | ▲ +364.8% |
| 2022 | 2.14x | CA$506.12 Million | CA$236.77 Million | ▲ +160.8% |
| 2021 | 0.82x | CA$490.40 Million | CA$598.39 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2019 | 0.73x | CA$568.73 Million | CA$775.83 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2018 | 0.77x | CA$404.00 Million | CA$528.10 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2017 | 0.49x | CA$354.03 Million | CA$715.29 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2016 | 0.55x | CA$455.42 Million | CA$830.84 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 2015 | 4.28x | CA$609.25 Million | CA$142.44 Million | ▲ +463.5% |
| 2014 | 0.76x | CA$504.00 Million | CA$664.00 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2013 | 0.57x | CA$408.00 Million | CA$713.00 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2012 | 0.33x | CA$444.00 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2011 | 0.40x | CA$356.00 Million | CA$884.00 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2010 | 1.21x | CA$368.00 Million | CA$303.00 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2009 | 2.40x | CA$272.97 Million | CA$113.87 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2008 | 2.26x | CA$331.44 Million | CA$146.92 Million | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2007 | 8.21x | CA$265.50 Million | CA$32.36 Million | ▲ +368.7% |
| 2006 | 1.75x | CA$286.76 Million | CA$163.81 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2005 | 1.86x | CA$261.38 Million | CA$140.63 Million | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2004 | 1.56x | CA$241.72 Million | CA$155.42 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2003 | 1.08x | CA$197.87 Million | CA$182.42 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2002 | 1.19x | CA$204.73 Million | CA$172.21 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2001 | 0.88x | CA$139.88 Million | CA$159.47 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2000 | 1.10x | CA$133.82 Million | CA$121.81 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 1999 | 0.80x | CA$82.00 Million | CA$102.70 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 1998 | 1.30x | CA$75.40 Million | CA$58.00 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 1997 | 1.20x | CA$43.50 Million | CA$36.40 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1996 | 1.08x | CA$16.40 Million | CA$15.20 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 1995 | 1.29x | CA$1.80 Million | CA$1.40 Million | — |