RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$89.61 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.83 Billion) in one year. Explore REI-UN strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust across 32 annual periods. Also explore REI-UN total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$434.07 Million | CA$7.74 Billion | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | CA$378.28 Million | CA$7.91 Billion | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$385.52 Million | CA$7.40 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$506.12 Million | CA$7.37 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | CA$490.40 Million | CA$7.27 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$552.58 Million | CA$7.53 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$568.73 Million | CA$6.88 Billion | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | CA$404.00 Million | CA$6.34 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | CA$354.03 Million | CA$6.33 Billion | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | CA$455.42 Million | CA$6.16 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | CA$609.25 Million | CA$8.07 Billion | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | CA$504.00 Million | CA$6.81 Billion | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | CA$408.00 Million | CA$6.26 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | CA$444.00 Million | CA$6.06 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | CA$356.00 Million | CA$5.33 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | CA$368.00 Million | CA$4.66 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$272.97 Million | CA$4.00 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | CA$331.44 Million | CA$3.59 Billion | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | CA$265.50 Million | CA$3.57 Billion | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | CA$286.76 Million | CA$2.95 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | CA$261.38 Million | CA$2.60 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | CA$241.72 Million | CA$2.37 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | CA$197.87 Million | CA$2.21 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | CA$204.73 Million | CA$1.89 Billion | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | CA$139.88 Million | CA$1.44 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | CA$133.82 Million | CA$1.25 Billion | ▲ +49.9% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | CA$82.00 Million | CA$1.15 Billion | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | CA$75.40 Million | CA$573.70 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | CA$43.50 Million | CA$379.40 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | CA$16.40 Million | CA$170.60 Million | ▲ +403.6% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | CA$1.80 Million | CA$94.30 Million | ▼ -77.7% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | CA$5.00 Million | CA$58.30 Million | — |