RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$89.61 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.83 Billion) in one year. See RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$434.07 Million | CA$7.74 Billion | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | CA$378.28 Million | CA$7.91 Billion | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$385.52 Million | CA$7.40 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$506.12 Million | CA$7.37 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | CA$490.40 Million | CA$7.27 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$552.58 Million | CA$7.53 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$568.73 Million | CA$6.88 Billion | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | CA$404.00 Million | CA$6.34 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | CA$354.03 Million | CA$6.33 Billion | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | CA$455.42 Million | CA$6.16 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | CA$609.25 Million | CA$8.07 Billion | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | CA$504.00 Million | CA$6.81 Billion | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | CA$408.00 Million | CA$6.26 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | CA$444.00 Million | CA$6.06 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | CA$356.00 Million | CA$5.33 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | CA$368.00 Million | CA$4.66 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$272.97 Million | CA$4.00 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | CA$331.44 Million | CA$3.59 Billion | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | CA$265.50 Million | CA$3.57 Billion | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | CA$286.76 Million | CA$2.95 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | CA$261.38 Million | CA$2.60 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | CA$241.72 Million | CA$2.37 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | CA$197.87 Million | CA$2.21 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | CA$204.73 Million | CA$1.89 Billion | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | CA$139.88 Million | CA$1.44 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | CA$133.82 Million | CA$1.25 Billion | ▲ +49.9% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | CA$82.00 Million | CA$1.15 Billion | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | CA$75.40 Million | CA$573.70 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | CA$43.50 Million | CA$379.40 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | CA$16.40 Million | CA$170.60 Million | ▲ +403.6% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | CA$1.80 Million | CA$94.30 Million | ▼ -77.7% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | CA$5.00 Million | CA$58.30 Million | — |