RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$169.78 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.50 Billion) in one year. See REI-UN financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust. Check RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$434.07 Million | CA$7.74 Billion | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | CA$378.28 Million | CA$7.91 Billion | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$385.52 Million | CA$7.40 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$506.12 Million | CA$7.37 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | CA$490.40 Million | CA$7.27 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$552.58 Million | CA$7.53 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$568.73 Million | CA$6.88 Billion | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | CA$404.00 Million | CA$6.34 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | CA$354.03 Million | CA$6.33 Billion | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | CA$455.42 Million | CA$6.16 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | CA$609.25 Million | CA$8.07 Billion | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | CA$504.00 Million | CA$6.81 Billion | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | CA$408.00 Million | CA$6.26 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | CA$444.00 Million | CA$6.06 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2011 | 0.07x | CA$356.00 Million | CA$5.33 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | CA$368.00 Million | CA$4.66 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$272.97 Million | CA$4.00 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | CA$331.44 Million | CA$3.59 Billion | ▲ +24.4% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | CA$265.50 Million | CA$3.57 Billion | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | CA$286.76 Million | CA$2.95 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | CA$261.38 Million | CA$2.60 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | CA$241.72 Million | CA$2.37 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | CA$197.87 Million | CA$2.21 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | CA$204.73 Million | CA$1.89 Billion | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | CA$139.88 Million | CA$1.44 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | CA$133.82 Million | CA$1.25 Billion | ▲ +49.9% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | CA$82.00 Million | CA$1.15 Billion | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | CA$75.40 Million | CA$573.70 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | CA$43.50 Million | CA$379.40 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 1996 | 0.10x | CA$16.40 Million | CA$170.60 Million | ▲ +403.6% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | CA$1.80 Million | CA$94.30 Million | ▼ -77.7% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | CA$5.00 Million | CA$58.30 Million | — |