Smith-Midland Corp (SMID) — Cash Flow Reinvestment Rate
Smith-Midland Corp (SMID) has a Cash Flow Reinvestment Rate of 1.53x as of March 2026, reinvesting $3.96 Million (capex $3.96 Million ) from operating cash flow of $2.59 Million. Explore SMID capital expenditure intensity to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
Reinvestment Rate
Total Reinvested
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Smith-Midland Corp Cash Flow Reinvestment Rate (1994–2025)
Historical reinvestment intensity for Smith-Midland Corp across 25 annual periods. Also explore SMID current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow Reinvestment Rate for Smith-Midland Corp (1994–2025)
Year-by-year capital reinvestment analysis for Smith-Midland Corp. For live market cap and broader valuation context, see SMID market cap overview.
| Year | Reinvestment Rate | Total Reinvested (USD) | Operating CF | Capex | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.65x | $9.34 Million | $14.30 Million | $9.34 Million | ▼ -72.7% |
| 2024 | 2.39x | $12.35 Million | $5.16 Million | $6.20 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2023 | 1.27x | $9.79 Million | $7.73 Million | $5.01 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2021 | 0.99x | $9.02 Million | $9.13 Million | $5.37 Million | ▲ +46.6% |
| 2020 | 0.67x | $5.05 Million | $7.49 Million | $2.63 Million | ▼ -49.6% |
| 2019 | 1.34x | $5.26 Million | $3.93 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2018 | 1.92x | $16.28 Million | $8.47 Million | $10.74 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2017 | 1.87x | $5.47 Million | $2.93 Million | $2.74 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2016 | 1.87x | $7.46 Million | $3.99 Million | $3.74 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2015 | 88.24x | $1.67 Million | $18.89K | $1.64 Million | ▲ +23024.9% |
| 2014 | 0.38x | $544.28K | $1.43 Million | $465.83K | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2013 | 2.36x | $1.93 Million | $819.85K | $908.61K | ▲ +6076.5% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $110.28K | $2.89 Million | $110.28K | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2010 | 1.05x | $1.17 Million | $1.12 Million | $1.17 Million | ▲ +386.6% |
| 2009 | 0.22x | $683.57K | $3.17 Million | $683.57K | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2008 | 0.39x | $654.74K | $1.66 Million | $654.74K | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2007 | 0.69x | $579.57K | $838.21K | $579.57K | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2005 | 0.59x | $727.97K | $1.23 Million | $727.97K | ▲ +52.9% |
| 2004 | 0.39x | $284.62K | $734.41K | $284.62K | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2002 | 1.17x | $756.76K | $644.80K | $756.76K | ▲ +238.2% |
| 2001 | 0.35x | $403.53K | $1.16 Million | $403.53K | ▼ -95.8% |
| 2000 | 8.20x | $437.61K | $53.37K | $437.61K | ▲ +441.7% |
| 1999 | 1.51x | $537.07K | $354.81K | $537.07K | ▲ +51.9% |
| 1997 | 1.00x | $524.23K | $526.00K | $524.23K | ▼ -66.8% |
| 1994 | 3.00x | $300.00K | $100.00K | $300.00K | — |