Smith-Midland Corp (SMID) — Free Cash Flow Generation Index
Smith-Midland Corp (SMID) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of -0.53x as of March 2026. Free cash flow of $-1.37 Million represents -1% of operating cash flow ($2.59 Million). See SMID net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Smith-Midland Corp Free Cash Flow Generation Index (1994–2025)
Historical FCF Generation Index trend for Smith-Midland Corp across 25 annual periods. Explore how well can Smith-Midland Corp service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation for Smith-Midland Corp (1994–2025)
Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for Smith-Midland Corp. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Smith-Midland Corp market cap and net worth.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.35x | $4.96 Million | $14.30 Million | $9.34 Million | ▲ +271.3% |
| 2024 | -0.20x | $-1.04 Million | $5.16 Million | $6.20 Million | ▼ -157.5% |
| 2023 | 0.35x | $2.72 Million | $7.73 Million | $5.01 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2021 | 0.41x | $3.76 Million | $9.13 Million | $5.37 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2020 | 0.65x | $4.86 Million | $7.49 Million | $2.63 Million | ▲ +371.8% |
| 2019 | -0.24x | $-939.00K | $3.93 Million | $4.87 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2018 | -0.27x | $-2.27 Million | $8.47 Million | $10.74 Million | ▼ -523.6% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $185.00K | $2.93 Million | $2.74 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $249.97K | $3.99 Million | $3.74 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2015 | -85.57x | $-1.62 Million | $18.89K | $1.64 Million | ▼ -12807.0% |
| 2014 | 0.67x | $960.52K | $1.43 Million | $465.83K | ▲ +722.0% |
| 2013 | -0.11x | $-88.76K | $819.85K | $908.61K | ▼ -111.3% |
| 2012 | 0.96x | $2.78 Million | $2.89 Million | $110.28K | ▲ +2071.3% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | $-54.64K | $1.12 Million | $1.17 Million | ▼ -106.2% |
| 2009 | 0.78x | $2.49 Million | $3.17 Million | $683.57K | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2008 | 0.61x | $1.01 Million | $1.66 Million | $654.74K | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $258.64K | $838.21K | $579.57K | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2005 | 0.41x | $500.32K | $1.23 Million | $727.97K | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $449.79K | $734.41K | $284.62K | ▲ +452.7% |
| 2002 | -0.17x | $-111.96K | $644.80K | $756.76K | ▼ -126.6% |
| 2001 | 0.65x | $759.30K | $1.16 Million | $403.53K | ▲ +109.1% |
| 2000 | -7.20x | $-384.25K | $53.37K | $437.61K | ▼ -1301.7% |
| 1999 | -0.51x | $-182.26K | $354.81K | $537.07K | ▼ -15348.2% |
| 1997 | 0.00x | $1.77K | $526.00K | $524.23K | ▲ +100.2% |
| 1994 | -2.00x | $-200.00K | $100.00K | $300.00K | — |