Smith-Midland Corp Free Cash Flow Generation Index
Smith-Midland Corp free cash flow generation index. Smith-Midland Corp (SMID) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of 0.48x as of March 2026. Free cash flow of $1.50 Million represents 0% of operating cash flow ($3.13 Million). Check Smith-Midland Corp liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Free Cash Flow Generation Index of Smith-Midland Corp (1994–2025)
Free cash flow generation index of Smith-Midland Corp from 1994 to 2025. Historical FCF Generation Index trend for Smith-Midland Corp across 25 annual periods. Explore SMID capex reinvestment rate to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
Smith-Midland Corp Free Cash Flow Generation Index by Year (1994–2025)
Smith-Midland Corp free cash flow generation index by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for Smith-Midland Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Smith-Midland Corp (SMID) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.35x | $4.96 Million | $14.30 Million | $9.34 Million | ▲ +271.3% |
| 2024 | -0.20x | $-1.04 Million | $5.16 Million | $6.20 Million | ▼ -157.5% |
| 2023 | 0.35x | $2.72 Million | $7.73 Million | $5.01 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2021 | 0.41x | $3.76 Million | $9.13 Million | $5.37 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2020 | 0.65x | $4.86 Million | $7.49 Million | $2.63 Million | ▲ +371.8% |
| 2019 | -0.24x | $-939.00K | $3.93 Million | $4.87 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2018 | -0.27x | $-2.27 Million | $8.47 Million | $10.74 Million | ▼ -523.6% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $185.00K | $2.93 Million | $2.74 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $249.97K | $3.99 Million | $3.74 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2015 | -85.57x | $-1.62 Million | $18.89K | $1.64 Million | ▼ -12807.0% |
| 2014 | 0.67x | $960.52K | $1.43 Million | $465.83K | ▲ +722.0% |
| 2013 | -0.11x | $-88.76K | $819.85K | $908.61K | ▼ -111.3% |
| 2012 | 0.96x | $2.78 Million | $2.89 Million | $110.28K | ▲ +2071.3% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | $-54.64K | $1.12 Million | $1.17 Million | ▼ -106.2% |
| 2009 | 0.78x | $2.49 Million | $3.17 Million | $683.57K | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2008 | 0.61x | $1.01 Million | $1.66 Million | $654.74K | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $258.64K | $838.21K | $579.57K | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2005 | 0.41x | $500.32K | $1.23 Million | $727.97K | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $449.79K | $734.41K | $284.62K | ▲ +452.7% |
| 2002 | -0.17x | $-111.96K | $644.80K | $756.76K | ▼ -126.6% |
| 2001 | 0.65x | $759.30K | $1.16 Million | $403.53K | ▲ +109.1% |
| 2000 | -7.20x | $-384.25K | $53.37K | $437.61K | ▼ -1301.7% |
| 1999 | -0.51x | $-182.26K | $354.81K | $537.07K | ▼ -15348.2% |
| 1997 | 0.00x | $1.77K | $526.00K | $524.23K | ▲ +100.2% |
| 1994 | -2.00x | $-200.00K | $100.00K | $300.00K | — |