Smith-Midland Corp Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Smith-Midland Corp strategic asset allocation index. Smith-Midland Corp (SMID) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 82.8% as of June 2023. Strategic assets (PP&E of $26.89 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $26.89 Million, measured against net assets of $32.46 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. Check Smith-Midland Corp tangible book value ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Strategic Asset Allocation Index of Smith-Midland Corp (2000–2022)
Strategic asset allocation index of Smith-Midland Corp from 2000 to 2022. This chart shows how Smith-Midland Corp's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2000 to 2022. As of June 2023, the index stands at 82.8%, representing strategic assets of $26.89 Million against net assets of $32.46 Million USD.
Smith-Midland Corp Strategic Asset Allocation Index by Year (2000–2022)
Smith-Midland Corp strategic asset allocation index by year from 2000 to 2022. The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Smith-Midland Corp from 2000 to 2022, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see SMID company net worth.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 76.0% | $25.12 Million | $25.12 Million | $- | $33.05 Million | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2021 | 69.1% | $21.93 Million | $21.93 Million | $- | $31.75 Million | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2020 | 78.7% | $18.60 Million | $18.60 Million | $- | $23.65 Million | ▼ -6.5 pp |
| 2019 | 85.2% | $17.73 Million | $17.73 Million | $- | $20.82 Million | ▲ +10.4 pp |
| 2018 | 74.8% | $14.10 Million | $14.10 Million | $- | $18.85 Million | ▲ +17.5 pp |
| 2017 | 57.3% | $9.87 Million | $9.87 Million | $- | $17.20 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2016 | 56.2% | $8.01 Million | $8.01 Million | $- | $14.24 Million | ▲ +11.7 pp |
| 2015 | 44.5% | $5.07 Million | $5.07 Million | $- | $11.39 Million | ▲ +5.3 pp |
| 2014 | 39.2% | $4.11 Million | $4.11 Million | $- | $10.47 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2013 | 37.9% | $4.32 Million | $4.32 Million | $- | $11.42 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2012 | 37.3% | $4.05 Million | $4.05 Million | $- | $10.87 Million | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2011 | 43.0% | $4.62 Million | $4.62 Million | $- | $10.73 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2010 | 42.0% | $4.60 Million | $4.60 Million | $- | $10.96 Million | ▼ -7.3 pp |
| 2009 | 49.3% | $4.18 Million | $4.18 Million | $- | $8.49 Million | ▼ -15.0 pp |
| 2008 | 64.3% | $4.22 Million | $4.22 Million | $- | $6.57 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2007 | 68.3% | $4.10 Million | $4.10 Million | $- | $6.00 Million | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2006 | 81.0% | $3.73 Million | $3.73 Million | $- | $4.61 Million | ▲ +16.4 pp |
| 2005 | 64.6% | $3.44 Million | $3.44 Million | $- | $5.33 Million | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2004 | 77.4% | $2.98 Million | $2.98 Million | $- | $3.84 Million | ▼ -19.8 pp |
| 2003 | 97.2% | $3.26 Million | $3.26 Million | $- | $3.35 Million | ▲ +39.6 pp |
| 2002 | 57.6% | $3.02 Million | $3.02 Million | $- | $5.24 Million | ▼ -10.2 pp |
| 2001 | 67.8% | $2.67 Million | $2.67 Million | $- | $3.94 Million | ▼ -73.0 pp |
| 2000 | 140.8% | $2.69 Million | $2.69 Million | $- | $1.91 Million | — |