Smith-Midland Corp (SMID) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Smith-Midland Corp (SMID) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.59 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($33.42 Million) in one year. See SMID free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Smith-Midland Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Smith-Midland Corp across 32 annual periods. Also explore Smith-Midland Corp (SMID) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Smith-Midland Corp (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Smith-Midland Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SMID company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.43x | $14.30 Million | $33.42 Million | ▲ +117.8% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $5.16 Million | $26.25 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $7.73 Million | $27.19 Million | ▲ +195.4% |
| 2022 | -0.30x | $-6.33 Million | $21.26 Million | ▼ -170.3% |
| 2021 | 0.42x | $9.13 Million | $21.52 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2020 | 0.33x | $7.49 Million | $22.85 Million | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $3.93 Million | $23.78 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $8.47 Million | $22.52 Million | ▲ +54.5% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $2.93 Million | $12.02 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | $3.99 Million | $9.81 Million | ▲ +15981.5% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | $18.89K | $7.46 Million | ▼ -99.0% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $1.43 Million | $5.82 Million | ▲ +116.2% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $819.85K | $7.24 Million | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2012 | 0.49x | $2.89 Million | $5.95 Million | ▲ +4070.8% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-83.11K | $6.80 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $1.12 Million | $7.16 Million | ▼ -66.1% |
| 2009 | 0.46x | $3.17 Million | $6.87 Million | ▲ +149.5% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.66 Million | $8.98 Million | ▲ +86.2% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $838.21K | $8.44 Million | ▲ +8606.0% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $-11.74K | $10.05 Million | ▼ -100.7% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $1.23 Million | $7.27 Million | ▲ +69.9% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | $734.41K | $7.39 Million | ▲ +203.8% |
| 2003 | -0.10x | $-899.30K | $9.39 Million | ▼ -222.6% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $644.80K | $8.26 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | $1.16 Million | $9.70 Million | ▲ +1953.0% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $53.37K | $9.14 Million | ▼ -87.1% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $354.81K | $7.86 Million | ▲ +231.5% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-284.76K | $8.30 Million | ▼ -138.1% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $526.00K | $5.84 Million | ▲ +213.5% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-428.88K | $5.41 Million | ▲ +71.4% |
| 1995 | -0.28x | $-1.50 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -1711.1% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $100.00K | $5.80 Million | — |