Hansol Pns (010420) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: 0.03x

Hansol Pns (010420) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩1.68 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩65.03 Billion) in one year. Explore Hansol Pns long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩1.68 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩65.03 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

Hansol Pns Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Hansol Pns across 18 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Hansol Pns for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hansol Pns (2000–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hansol Pns. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Hansol Pns (010420) total market value.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.06x ₩5.09 Billion ₩80.15 Billion ▲ +53.8%
2023 0.04x ₩3.26 Billion ₩78.87 Billion ▼ -79.3%
2022 0.20x ₩16.72 Billion ₩83.84 Billion ▲ +217.0%
2021 -0.17x ₩-10.17 Billion ₩59.67 Billion ▼ -207.9%
2020 0.16x ₩10.03 Billion ₩63.47 Billion ▼ -40.7%
2019 0.27x ₩16.60 Billion ₩62.35 Billion ▲ +270.1%
2018 -0.16x ₩-8.27 Billion ₩52.83 Billion ▼ -202.6%
2017 0.15x ₩10.03 Billion ₩65.75 Billion ▲ +5.4%
2016 0.14x ₩10.03 Billion ₩69.33 Billion ▲ +92.5%
2015 0.08x ₩5.26 Billion ₩69.96 Billion ▼ -46.3%
2014 0.14x ₩10.28 Billion ₩73.42 Billion ▲ +274.1%
2013 -0.08x ₩-7.30 Billion ₩90.84 Billion ▼ -195.2%
2010 0.08x ₩7.64 Billion ₩90.54 Billion ▼ -15.5%
2009 0.10x ₩6.73 Billion ₩67.41 Billion ▼ -39.5%
2008 0.17x ₩6.66 Billion ₩40.33 Billion ▲ +30.4%
2003 0.13x ₩6.20 Billion ₩48.96 Billion ▲ +5.1%
2002 0.12x ₩6.98 Billion ₩57.88 Billion ▼ -12.2%
2000 0.14x ₩15.24 Billion ₩110.99 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.