Korea Kolmar Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: 0.03x

Korea Kolmar cash flow-to-debt ratio. Korea Kolmar (161890) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩61.24 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩1.98 Trillion) in one year. Check 161890 capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩61.24 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩1.98 Trillion
KRW

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Korea Kolmar (2012–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Korea Kolmar from 2012 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Korea Kolmar across 14 annual periods. Check 161890 operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Korea Kolmar Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2012–2025)

Korea Kolmar cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2012 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Korea Kolmar. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Korea Kolmar.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.16x ₩291.43 Billion ₩1.79 Trillion ▲ +22.5%
2024 0.13x ₩215.38 Billion ₩1.62 Trillion ▲ +88.3%
2023 0.07x ₩112.24 Billion ₩1.59 Trillion ▲ +13.7%
2022 0.06x ₩90.81 Billion ₩1.46 Trillion ▲ +2576.2%
2021 0.00x ₩-3.12 Billion ₩1.25 Trillion ▼ -103.1%
2020 0.08x ₩121.46 Billion ₩1.49 Trillion ▼ -23.2%
2019 0.11x ₩164.84 Billion ₩1.55 Trillion ▲ +132.9%
2018 0.05x ₩62.76 Billion ₩1.38 Trillion ▲ +184.3%
2017 0.02x ₩5.39 Billion ₩335.91 Billion ▼ -91.4%
2016 0.19x ₩38.21 Billion ₩205.24 Billion ▼ -53.4%
2015 0.40x ₩49.42 Billion ₩123.61 Billion ▲ +81.9%
2014 0.22x ₩34.42 Billion ₩156.58 Billion ▲ +59.5%
2013 0.14x ₩24.95 Billion ₩181.05 Billion ▲ +34.0%
2012 0.10x ₩13.60 Billion ₩132.21 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.