LVMC Holdings (900140) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.06x

LVMC Holdings (900140) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩11.53 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩196.53 Billion) in one year. See LVMC Holdings free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.06x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩11.53 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩196.53 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

LVMC Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for LVMC Holdings across 17 annual periods. Also explore 900140 net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LVMC Holdings (2008–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LVMC Holdings. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 900140 market cap.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.12x ₩23.78 Billion ₩196.53 Billion ▲ +1184.6%
2024 0.01x ₩2.52 Billion ₩267.81 Billion ▲ +131.5%
2023 -0.03x ₩-6.97 Billion ₩233.55 Billion ▼ -111.2%
2022 0.27x ₩68.20 Billion ₩255.45 Billion ▼ -44.0%
2021 0.48x ₩109.00 Billion ₩228.74 Billion ▲ +113.7%
2020 0.22x ₩64.45 Billion ₩289.01 Billion ▲ +197.4%
2019 0.07x ₩26.46 Billion ₩352.92 Billion ▲ +3060.4%
2018 0.00x ₩697.58 Million ₩294.01 Billion ▼ -96.7%
2017 0.07x ₩16.77 Billion ₩232.90 Billion ▲ +601401.2%
2016 0.00x ₩3.02 Million ₩252.04 Billion ▲ +100.0%
2015 -0.09x ₩-15.90 Million ₩183.38 Million ▲ +83.9%
2014 -0.54x ₩-67.98 Million ₩126.36 Million ▼ -44.7%
2013 -0.37x ₩-24.81 Million ₩66.71 Million ▼ -310.6%
2012 0.18x ₩4.52 Million ₩25.59 Million ▼ -56.5%
2010 0.41x ₩1.75 Million ₩4.32 Million ▼ -17.8%
2009 0.49x ₩3.02 Million ₩6.12 Million ▲ +200.8%
2008 0.16x ₩1.57 Billion ₩9.56 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.