Osangjaiel Co. Ltd (053980) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: 0.11x

Osangjaiel Co. Ltd (053980) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩5.60 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩50.20 Billion) in one year. Explore Osangjaiel Co. Ltd long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.11x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩5.60 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩50.20 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Osangjaiel Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Osangjaiel Co. Ltd across 17 annual periods. Also explore 053980 current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Osangjaiel Co. Ltd (2009–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Osangjaiel Co. Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 053980 company net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.29x ₩11.08 Billion ₩37.92 Billion ▼ -37.4%
2024 0.47x ₩15.02 Billion ₩32.18 Billion ▲ +31.1%
2023 0.36x ₩13.37 Billion ₩37.54 Billion ▲ +61.0%
2022 0.22x ₩6.13 Billion ₩27.72 Billion ▲ +117.6%
2021 0.10x ₩3.08 Billion ₩30.31 Billion ▼ -28.2%
2020 0.14x ₩5.55 Billion ₩39.21 Billion ▲ +107.9%
2019 0.07x ₩2.46 Billion ₩36.06 Billion ▲ +45.6%
2018 0.05x ₩1.60 Billion ₩34.20 Billion ▲ +171.3%
2017 -0.07x ₩-2.07 Billion ₩31.58 Billion ▼ -140.4%
2016 0.16x ₩5.54 Billion ₩34.16 Billion ▲ +23.8%
2015 0.13x ₩3.22 Billion ₩24.56 Billion ▲ +23.1%
2014 0.11x ₩3.32 Billion ₩31.22 Billion ▼ -25.6%
2013 0.14x ₩4.24 Billion ₩29.64 Billion ▼ -40.2%
2012 0.24x ₩7.57 Billion ₩31.63 Billion ▲ +380.2%
2011 0.05x ₩1.26 Billion ₩25.33 Billion ▼ -74.8%
2010 0.20x ₩4.86 Billion ₩24.52 Billion ▲ +92.1%
2009 0.10x ₩2.71 Billion ₩26.28 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.