Osangjaiel Co. Ltd (053980) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: 0.11x

Osangjaiel Co. Ltd (053980) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩5.60 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩50.20 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Osangjaiel Co. Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.11x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩5.60 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩50.20 Billion
KRW

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Osangjaiel Co. Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Osangjaiel Co. Ltd across 17 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Osangjaiel Co. Ltd cash flow conversion.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Osangjaiel Co. Ltd (2009–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Osangjaiel Co. Ltd. Check 053980 cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.29x ₩11.08 Billion ₩37.92 Billion ▼ -37.4%
2024 0.47x ₩15.02 Billion ₩32.18 Billion ▲ +31.1%
2023 0.36x ₩13.37 Billion ₩37.54 Billion ▲ +61.0%
2022 0.22x ₩6.13 Billion ₩27.72 Billion ▲ +117.6%
2021 0.10x ₩3.08 Billion ₩30.31 Billion ▼ -28.2%
2020 0.14x ₩5.55 Billion ₩39.21 Billion ▲ +107.9%
2019 0.07x ₩2.46 Billion ₩36.06 Billion ▲ +45.6%
2018 0.05x ₩1.60 Billion ₩34.20 Billion ▲ +171.3%
2017 -0.07x ₩-2.07 Billion ₩31.58 Billion ▼ -140.4%
2016 0.16x ₩5.54 Billion ₩34.16 Billion ▲ +23.8%
2015 0.13x ₩3.22 Billion ₩24.56 Billion ▲ +23.1%
2014 0.11x ₩3.32 Billion ₩31.22 Billion ▼ -25.6%
2013 0.14x ₩4.24 Billion ₩29.64 Billion ▼ -40.2%
2012 0.24x ₩7.57 Billion ₩31.63 Billion ▲ +380.2%
2011 0.05x ₩1.26 Billion ₩25.33 Billion ▼ -74.8%
2010 0.20x ₩4.86 Billion ₩24.52 Billion ▲ +92.1%
2009 0.10x ₩2.71 Billion ₩26.28 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.