Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd (HKLB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd (HKLB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $267.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.90 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd. Check earnings quality score of Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | $670.60 Million | $9.08 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | $701.60 Million | $8.78 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $858.30 Million | $9.27 Billion | ▲ +61.9% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $528.60 Million | $9.24 Billion | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $981.10 Million | $8.52 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $1.18 Billion | $6.97 Billion | ▲ +85.0% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $604.40 Million | $6.59 Billion | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $800.20 Million | $6.14 Billion | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $1.10 Billion | $5.64 Billion | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $896.20 Million | $5.65 Billion | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $699.00 Million | $6.03 Billion | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $907.90 Million | $6.10 Billion | ▲ +179.2% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $298.70 Million | $5.60 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $336.30 Million | $4.26 Billion | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $690.40 Million | $4.67 Billion | ▲ +9.5% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $903.30 Million | $6.68 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $531.00 Million | $4.51 Billion | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $404.30 Million | $6.46 Billion | ▲ +326.3% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $83.30 Million | $5.67 Billion | ▼ -56.7% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $156.20 Million | $4.60 Billion | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $218.20 Million | $3.31 Billion | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $150.80 Million | $2.95 Billion | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $192.80 Million | $2.40 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | $201.90 Million | $2.15 Billion | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $214.30 Million | $2.52 Billion | ▼ -26.0% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $253.30 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -26.3% |
| 1998 | 0.16x | $347.30 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▼ -15.2% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $415.20 Million | $2.26 Billion | — |