Applied Materials Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Applied Materials Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Applied Materials Inc (AMAT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of July 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.04 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($17.90 Billion) in one year. Check AMAT capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Applied Materials Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Applied Materials Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Applied Materials Inc across 37 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of Applied Materials Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Applied Materials Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Applied Materials Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Applied Materials Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Applied Materials Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.50x | $7.96 Billion | $15.88 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2024 | 0.56x | $8.68 Billion | $15.41 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2023 | 0.61x | $8.70 Billion | $14.38 Billion | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2022 | 0.37x | $5.40 Billion | $14.53 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2021 | 0.40x | $5.44 Billion | $13.58 Billion | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2020 | 0.32x | $3.80 Billion | $11.78 Billion | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $3.25 Billion | $10.81 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2018 | 0.35x | $3.79 Billion | $10.93 Billion | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2017 | 0.36x | $3.61 Billion | $10.07 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | $2.47 Billion | $7.37 Billion | ▲ +121.4% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $1.16 Billion | $7.70 Billion | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $1.80 Billion | $5.27 Billion | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $623.00 Million | $4.96 Billion | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | $1.85 Billion | $4.87 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2011 | 0.48x | $2.43 Billion | $5.06 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2010 | 0.51x | $1.72 Billion | $3.41 Billion | ▲ +276.1% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $333.38 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -72.8% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | $1.71 Billion | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2007 | 0.78x | $2.21 Billion | $2.83 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2006 | 0.68x | $1.94 Billion | $2.83 Billion | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2005 | 0.53x | $1.25 Billion | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | $1.63 Billion | $2.83 Billion | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $801.75 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $492.14 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -68.6% |
| 2001 | 0.71x | $1.58 Billion | $2.22 Billion | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2000 | 0.48x | $1.65 Billion | $3.44 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1999 | 0.46x | $1.08 Billion | $2.37 Billion | ▲ +1.0% |
| 1998 | 0.45x | $816.40 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▲ +36.9% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $701.70 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▼ -39.6% |
| 1996 | 0.55x | $692.00 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +352.1% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $142.70 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $111.00 Million | $736.40 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $117.00 Million | $521.40 Million | ▲ +43.9% |
| 1992 | 0.16x | $59.20 Million | $379.70 Million | ▲ +34.0% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $39.00 Million | $335.30 Million | ▼ -29.3% |
| 1990 | 0.16x | $42.40 Million | $257.70 Million | ▲ +91.8% |
| 1989 | 0.09x | $15.40 Million | $179.50 Million | — |