Applied Materials Inc (AMAT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Applied Materials Inc (AMAT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $843.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($16.38 Billion) in one year. Explore AMAT long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Applied Materials Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Applied Materials Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore AMAT total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Applied Materials Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Applied Materials Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Applied Materials Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.50x | $7.96 Billion | $15.88 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2024 | 0.56x | $8.68 Billion | $15.41 Billion | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2023 | 0.61x | $8.70 Billion | $14.38 Billion | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2022 | 0.37x | $5.40 Billion | $14.53 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2021 | 0.40x | $5.44 Billion | $13.58 Billion | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2020 | 0.32x | $3.80 Billion | $11.78 Billion | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $3.25 Billion | $10.81 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2018 | 0.35x | $3.79 Billion | $10.93 Billion | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2017 | 0.36x | $3.61 Billion | $10.07 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | $2.47 Billion | $7.37 Billion | ▲ +121.4% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $1.16 Billion | $7.70 Billion | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $1.80 Billion | $5.27 Billion | ▲ +171.6% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $623.00 Million | $4.96 Billion | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | $1.85 Billion | $4.87 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2011 | 0.48x | $2.43 Billion | $5.06 Billion | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2010 | 0.51x | $1.72 Billion | $3.41 Billion | ▲ +276.1% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $333.38 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▼ -72.8% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | $1.71 Billion | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2007 | 0.78x | $2.21 Billion | $2.83 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2006 | 0.68x | $1.94 Billion | $2.83 Billion | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2005 | 0.53x | $1.25 Billion | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2004 | 0.57x | $1.63 Billion | $2.83 Billion | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $801.75 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $492.14 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -68.6% |
| 2001 | 0.71x | $1.58 Billion | $2.22 Billion | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2000 | 0.48x | $1.65 Billion | $3.44 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1999 | 0.46x | $1.08 Billion | $2.37 Billion | ▲ +1.0% |
| 1998 | 0.45x | $816.40 Million | $1.81 Billion | ▲ +36.9% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $701.70 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▼ -39.6% |
| 1996 | 0.55x | $692.00 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +352.1% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $142.70 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $111.00 Million | $736.40 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $117.00 Million | $521.40 Million | ▲ +43.9% |
| 1992 | 0.16x | $59.20 Million | $379.70 Million | ▲ +34.0% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $39.00 Million | $335.30 Million | ▼ -29.3% |
| 1990 | 0.16x | $42.40 Million | $257.70 Million | ▲ +91.8% |
| 1989 | 0.09x | $15.40 Million | $179.50 Million | — |