Amedisys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Amedisys Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Amedisys Inc (AMED) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $67.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($940.48 Million) in one year. Check Amedisys Inc (AMED) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Amedisys Inc (1994–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Amedisys Inc from 1994 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Amedisys Inc across 31 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Amedisys Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Amedisys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2024)
Amedisys Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Amedisys Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AMED cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.23x | $221.66 Million | $958.75 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $137.19 Million | $940.39 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $133.28 Million | $869.67 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $188.89 Million | $880.64 Million | ▼ -43.8% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $288.95 Million | $756.46 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2019 | 0.33x | $202.00 Million | $621.23 Million | ▼ -65.9% |
| 2018 | 0.95x | $223.48 Million | $234.49 Million | ▲ +167.8% |
| 2017 | 0.36x | $105.73 Million | $297.06 Million | ▲ +56.0% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $62.26 Million | $272.89 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2015 | 0.39x | $107.78 Million | $274.65 Million | ▲ +262.9% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | $-65.53 Million | $271.98 Million | ▼ -183.4% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $102.26 Million | $353.93 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $69.49 Million | $276.36 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $141.66 Million | $338.14 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $206.27 Million | $420.11 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2009 | 0.57x | $247.66 Million | $436.02 Million | ▲ +91.4% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $150.74 Million | $508.08 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2007 | 0.67x | $93.08 Million | $139.29 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $43.08 Million | $99.75 Million | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $43.54 Million | $147.40 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2004 | 0.58x | $29.71 Million | $51.26 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2003 | 0.53x | $21.79 Million | $41.07 Million | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $11.12 Million | $41.36 Million | ▲ +55.3% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $7.66 Million | $44.27 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2000 | 0.16x | $6.91 Million | $43.49 Million | ▲ +190.4% |
| 1999 | -0.18x | $-9.18 Million | $52.19 Million | ▼ -229.1% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $7.63 Million | $56.01 Million | ▲ +274.0% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-1.14 Million | $14.59 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-934.84K | $12.36 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 1995 | 0.22x | $1.60 Million | $7.20 Million | ▲ +191.1% |
| 1994 | -0.24x | $-1.00 Million | $4.10 Million | — |