Amedisys Inc (AMED) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Amedisys Inc (AMED) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $67.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($940.48 Million) in one year. See AMED free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Amedisys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Amedisys Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore AMED year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Amedisys Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Amedisys Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Amedisys Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.23x | $221.66 Million | $958.75 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $137.19 Million | $940.39 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $133.28 Million | $869.67 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $188.89 Million | $880.64 Million | ▼ -43.8% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $288.95 Million | $756.46 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2019 | 0.33x | $202.00 Million | $621.23 Million | ▼ -65.9% |
| 2018 | 0.95x | $223.48 Million | $234.49 Million | ▲ +167.8% |
| 2017 | 0.36x | $105.73 Million | $297.06 Million | ▲ +56.0% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $62.26 Million | $272.89 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2015 | 0.39x | $107.78 Million | $274.65 Million | ▲ +262.9% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | $-65.53 Million | $271.98 Million | ▼ -183.4% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $102.26 Million | $353.93 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $69.49 Million | $276.36 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $141.66 Million | $338.14 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $206.27 Million | $420.11 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2009 | 0.57x | $247.66 Million | $436.02 Million | ▲ +91.4% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $150.74 Million | $508.08 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2007 | 0.67x | $93.08 Million | $139.29 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $43.08 Million | $99.75 Million | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $43.54 Million | $147.40 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2004 | 0.58x | $29.71 Million | $51.26 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2003 | 0.53x | $21.79 Million | $41.07 Million | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $11.12 Million | $41.36 Million | ▲ +55.3% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $7.66 Million | $44.27 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2000 | 0.16x | $6.91 Million | $43.49 Million | ▲ +190.4% |
| 1999 | -0.18x | $-9.18 Million | $52.19 Million | ▼ -229.1% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $7.63 Million | $56.01 Million | ▲ +274.0% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-1.14 Million | $14.59 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-934.84K | $12.36 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 1995 | 0.22x | $1.60 Million | $7.20 Million | ▲ +191.1% |
| 1994 | -0.24x | $-1.00 Million | $4.10 Million | — |