Amedisys Inc (AMED) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Amedisys Inc (AMED) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $67.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($940.48 Million) in one year. Explore Amedisys Inc (AMED) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Amedisys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Amedisys Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Amedisys Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Amedisys Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Amedisys Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AMED market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.23x | $221.66 Million | $958.75 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $137.19 Million | $940.39 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $133.28 Million | $869.67 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $188.89 Million | $880.64 Million | ▼ -43.8% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $288.95 Million | $756.46 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2019 | 0.33x | $202.00 Million | $621.23 Million | ▼ -65.9% |
| 2018 | 0.95x | $223.48 Million | $234.49 Million | ▲ +167.8% |
| 2017 | 0.36x | $105.73 Million | $297.06 Million | ▲ +56.0% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $62.26 Million | $272.89 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2015 | 0.39x | $107.78 Million | $274.65 Million | ▲ +262.9% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | $-65.53 Million | $271.98 Million | ▼ -183.4% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $102.26 Million | $353.93 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $69.49 Million | $276.36 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $141.66 Million | $338.14 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $206.27 Million | $420.11 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2009 | 0.57x | $247.66 Million | $436.02 Million | ▲ +91.4% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $150.74 Million | $508.08 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2007 | 0.67x | $93.08 Million | $139.29 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $43.08 Million | $99.75 Million | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $43.54 Million | $147.40 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2004 | 0.58x | $29.71 Million | $51.26 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2003 | 0.53x | $21.79 Million | $41.07 Million | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $11.12 Million | $41.36 Million | ▲ +55.3% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $7.66 Million | $44.27 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2000 | 0.16x | $6.91 Million | $43.49 Million | ▲ +190.4% |
| 1999 | -0.18x | $-9.18 Million | $52.19 Million | ▼ -229.1% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $7.63 Million | $56.01 Million | ▲ +274.0% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-1.14 Million | $14.59 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-934.84K | $12.36 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 1995 | 0.22x | $1.60 Million | $7.20 Million | ▲ +191.1% |
| 1994 | -0.24x | $-1.00 Million | $4.10 Million | — |