Amedisys Inc (AMED) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Amedisys Inc (AMED) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $67.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($940.48 Million) in one year. See AMED free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Amedisys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Amedisys Inc across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Amedisys Inc (AMED) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Amedisys Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Amedisys Inc. Check AMED operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.23x | $221.66 Million | $958.75 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $137.19 Million | $940.39 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $133.28 Million | $869.67 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $188.89 Million | $880.64 Million | ▼ -43.8% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $288.95 Million | $756.46 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2019 | 0.33x | $202.00 Million | $621.23 Million | ▼ -65.9% |
| 2018 | 0.95x | $223.48 Million | $234.49 Million | ▲ +167.8% |
| 2017 | 0.36x | $105.73 Million | $297.06 Million | ▲ +56.0% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $62.26 Million | $272.89 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2015 | 0.39x | $107.78 Million | $274.65 Million | ▲ +262.9% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | $-65.53 Million | $271.98 Million | ▼ -183.4% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $102.26 Million | $353.93 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $69.49 Million | $276.36 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $141.66 Million | $338.14 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $206.27 Million | $420.11 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2009 | 0.57x | $247.66 Million | $436.02 Million | ▲ +91.4% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $150.74 Million | $508.08 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2007 | 0.67x | $93.08 Million | $139.29 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $43.08 Million | $99.75 Million | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $43.54 Million | $147.40 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2004 | 0.58x | $29.71 Million | $51.26 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2003 | 0.53x | $21.79 Million | $41.07 Million | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $11.12 Million | $41.36 Million | ▲ +55.3% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $7.66 Million | $44.27 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2000 | 0.16x | $6.91 Million | $43.49 Million | ▲ +190.4% |
| 1999 | -0.18x | $-9.18 Million | $52.19 Million | ▼ -229.1% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $7.63 Million | $56.01 Million | ▲ +274.0% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-1.14 Million | $14.59 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-934.84K | $12.36 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 1995 | 0.22x | $1.60 Million | $7.20 Million | ▲ +191.1% |
| 1994 | -0.24x | $-1.00 Million | $4.10 Million | — |