Amedisys Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Amedisys Inc tangible net worth ratio. Amedisys Inc (AMED) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 93.8% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($79.24 Million) from net assets ($1.27 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check AMED strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Amedisys Inc (1993–2024)
Tangible net worth ratio of Amedisys Inc from 1993 to 2024. This chart shows how Amedisys Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 29 annual periods from 1993 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 93.8%, reflecting net assets of $1.27 Billion with intangible assets of $79.24 Million USD. See Amedisys Inc (AMED) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Amedisys Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1993–2024)
Amedisys Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 1993 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Amedisys Inc from 1993 to 2024, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Amedisys Inc (AMED) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 93.1% | $1.18 Billion | $81.16 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2023 | 90.8% | $1.12 Billion | $102.67 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 90.9% | $1.11 Billion | $101.17 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2021 | 88.6% | $976.32 Million | $111.19 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2020 | 90.8% | $810.74 Million | $74.18 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2019 | 89.9% | $641.51 Million | $64.75 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2018 | 90.9% | $482.63 Million | $44.13 Million | $717.12 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2017 | 91.1% | $516.43 Million | $46.06 Million | $813.48 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2016 | 89.9% | $461.14 Million | $46.76 Million | $734.03 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2015 | 89.3% | $410.44 Million | $44.05 Million | $685.09 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2014 | 91.7% | $397.76 Million | $33.19 Million | $669.74 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2013 | 90.1% | $372.48 Million | $36.69 Million | $726.41 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2012 | 89.6% | $454.23 Million | $47.05 Million | $730.60 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2011 | 90.4% | $520.15 Million | $50.07 Million | $858.28 Million | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2010 | 93.9% | $879.72 Million | $53.39 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2009 | 92.2% | $736.34 Million | $57.61 Million | $1.17 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2008 | 92.5% | $562.12 Million | $42.39 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2007 | 96.8% | $447.82 Million | $14.30 Million | $587.11 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2006 | 96.5% | $364.01 Million | $12.73 Million | $463.76 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2005 | 94.1% | $192.60 Million | $11.45 Million | $340.00 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2004 | 97.0% | $148.47 Million | $4.45 Million | $199.73 Million | ▲ +66.4 pp |
| 2003 | 30.6% | $51.40 Million | $35.66 Million | $92.47 Million | ▲ +81.7 pp |
| 2002 | -51.1% | $16.96 Million | $25.62 Million | $58.32 Million | ▲ +507.4 pp |
| 2001 | -558.4% | $3.37 Million | $22.22 Million | $47.64 Million | ▼ -658.4 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $8.28 Million | $0.00 | $22.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $4.50 Million | $0.00 | $16.86 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $4.30 Million | $0.00 | $11.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $2.20 Million | $0.00 | $6.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $1.90 Million | $0.00 | $4.30 Million | — |