Amedisys Inc (AMED) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Amedisys Inc (AMED) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 93.8% as of June 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($79.24 Million) from net assets ($1.27 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See AMED net asset value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Amedisys Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1993–2024)
This chart shows how Amedisys Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 29 annual periods from 1993 to 2024. As of June 2025, the ratio stands at 93.8%, reflecting net assets of $1.27 Billion with intangible assets of $79.24 Million USD. Also explore AMED net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Amedisys Inc (1993–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Amedisys Inc from 1993 to 2024, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Amedisys Inc (AMED) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 93.1% | $1.18 Billion | $81.16 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2023 | 90.8% | $1.12 Billion | $102.67 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 90.9% | $1.11 Billion | $101.17 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2021 | 88.6% | $976.32 Million | $111.19 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2020 | 90.8% | $810.74 Million | $74.18 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2019 | 89.9% | $641.51 Million | $64.75 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2018 | 90.9% | $482.63 Million | $44.13 Million | $717.12 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2017 | 91.1% | $516.43 Million | $46.06 Million | $813.48 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2016 | 89.9% | $461.14 Million | $46.76 Million | $734.03 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2015 | 89.3% | $410.44 Million | $44.05 Million | $685.09 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2014 | 91.7% | $397.76 Million | $33.19 Million | $669.74 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2013 | 90.1% | $372.48 Million | $36.69 Million | $726.41 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2012 | 89.6% | $454.23 Million | $47.05 Million | $730.60 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2011 | 90.4% | $520.15 Million | $50.07 Million | $858.28 Million | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2010 | 93.9% | $879.72 Million | $53.39 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2009 | 92.2% | $736.34 Million | $57.61 Million | $1.17 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2008 | 92.5% | $562.12 Million | $42.39 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2007 | 96.8% | $447.82 Million | $14.30 Million | $587.11 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2006 | 96.5% | $364.01 Million | $12.73 Million | $463.76 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2005 | 94.1% | $192.60 Million | $11.45 Million | $340.00 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2004 | 97.0% | $148.47 Million | $4.45 Million | $199.73 Million | ▲ +66.4 pp |
| 2003 | 30.6% | $51.40 Million | $35.66 Million | $92.47 Million | ▲ +81.7 pp |
| 2002 | -51.1% | $16.96 Million | $25.62 Million | $58.32 Million | ▲ +507.4 pp |
| 2001 | -558.4% | $3.37 Million | $22.22 Million | $47.64 Million | ▼ -658.4 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $8.28 Million | $0.00 | $22.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $4.50 Million | $0.00 | $16.86 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $4.30 Million | $0.00 | $11.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $2.20 Million | $0.00 | $6.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $1.90 Million | $0.00 | $4.30 Million | — |