Amedisys Inc (AMED) — Free Cash Flow Generation Index
Amedisys Inc (AMED) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of 0.99x as of June 2025. Free cash flow of $66.51 Million represents 1% of operating cash flow ($67.21 Million). Explore Amedisys Inc capital spending ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Amedisys Inc Free Cash Flow Generation Index (1995–2024)
Historical FCF Generation Index trend for Amedisys Inc across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Amedisys Inc.
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation for Amedisys Inc (1995–2024)
Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for Amedisys Inc. Check Amedisys Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.97x | $215.12 Million | $221.66 Million | $6.55 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2023 | 0.91x | $124.47 Million | $137.19 Million | $12.71 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2022 | 0.95x | $126.07 Million | $133.28 Million | $7.21 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2021 | 0.96x | $182.17 Million | $188.89 Million | $6.72 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2020 | 0.98x | $283.62 Million | $288.95 Million | $5.33 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2019 | 0.96x | $194.11 Million | $202.00 Million | $7.89 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2018 | 0.97x | $216.93 Million | $223.48 Million | $6.56 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2017 | 0.90x | $95.02 Million | $105.73 Million | $10.71 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2016 | 0.75x | $46.54 Million | $62.26 Million | $15.72 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2015 | 0.80x | $86.36 Million | $107.78 Million | $21.43 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2013 | 0.59x | $60.53 Million | $102.26 Million | $41.74 Million | ▲ +93.7% |
| 2012 | 0.31x | $21.23 Million | $69.49 Million | $48.26 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $97.25 Million | $141.66 Million | $44.41 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2010 | 0.68x | $139.93 Million | $206.27 Million | $66.35 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2009 | 0.83x | $206.09 Million | $247.66 Million | $41.57 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2008 | 0.78x | $117.63 Million | $150.74 Million | $33.12 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2007 | 0.69x | $64.45 Million | $93.08 Million | $28.63 Million | ▲ +116.0% |
| 2006 | 0.32x | $13.81 Million | $43.08 Million | $29.27 Million | ▼ -39.7% |
| 2005 | 0.53x | $23.15 Million | $43.54 Million | $20.39 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $24.48 Million | $29.71 Million | $5.23 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2003 | 0.92x | $20.00 Million | $21.79 Million | $1.79 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2002 | 0.89x | $9.85 Million | $11.12 Million | $1.27 Million | ▲ +217.8% |
| 2001 | -0.75x | $-5.76 Million | $7.66 Million | $13.42 Million | ▼ -179.1% |
| 2000 | 0.95x | $6.58 Million | $6.91 Million | $338.00K | ▲ +68.5% |
| 1998 | 0.56x | $4.30 Million | $7.63 Million | $3.32 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 1995 | 0.75x | $1.20 Million | $1.60 Million | $400.00K | — |