Amkor Technology Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Amkor Technology Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Amkor Technology Inc (AMKR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $145.09 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.73 Billion) in one year. Check Amkor Technology Inc (AMKR) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Amkor Technology Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Amkor Technology Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Amkor Technology Inc across 29 annual periods. Check AMKR cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Amkor Technology Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Amkor Technology Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Amkor Technology Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Amkor Technology Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.30x | $1.10 Billion | $3.63 Billion | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2024 | 0.39x | $1.09 Billion | $2.76 Billion | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2023 | 0.46x | $1.27 Billion | $2.78 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | $1.10 Billion | $3.12 Billion | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2021 | 0.37x | $1.12 Billion | $3.07 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | $770.03 Million | $2.67 Billion | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $563.85 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $663.41 Million | $2.64 Billion | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $618.27 Million | $2.83 Billion | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $729.40 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $577.95 Million | $2.81 Billion | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | $613.91 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $557.54 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $382.96 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $516.83 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | $542.60 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▲ +101.7% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $261.73 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | $605.82 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2007 | 0.24x | $603.43 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $523.63 Million | $2.64 Billion | ▲ +456.4% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $97.11 Million | $2.73 Billion | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $216.61 Million | $2.59 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $176.35 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | $176.48 Million | $2.32 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2001 | 0.07x | $160.47 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -59.6% |
| 2000 | 0.18x | $373.82 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -37.6% |
| 1999 | 0.29x | $293.30 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -37.8% |
| 1998 | 0.46x | $237.96 Million | $513.24 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $250.05 Million | $755.43 Million | — |