Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. (BGMS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-33.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.34 Million) in one year. See Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. (BGMS) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. (2005–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. from 2005 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. across 21 annual periods. Also explore BGMS net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2005–2025)
Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2005 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bio Green Med Solution, Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Bio Green Med Solution, Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -3.55x | $-4.77 Million | $1.34 Million | ▼ -178.6% |
| 2024 | -1.27x | $-7.99 Million | $6.27 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2023 | -1.97x | $-16.11 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2022 | -2.73x | $-20.83 Million | $7.62 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2021 | -3.41x | $-18.54 Million | $5.44 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2020 | -2.24x | $-7.93 Million | $3.54 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2019 | -2.62x | $-9.45 Million | $3.61 Million | ▼ -77.7% |
| 2018 | -1.47x | $-6.70 Million | $4.55 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2017 | -1.77x | $-7.48 Million | $4.24 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2016 | -1.87x | $-10.08 Million | $5.39 Million | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2015 | -2.44x | $-14.46 Million | $5.93 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2014 | -2.43x | $-18.70 Million | $7.70 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2013 | -2.43x | $-18.20 Million | $7.50 Million | ▼ -88.2% |
| 2012 | -1.29x | $-12.04 Million | $9.34 Million | ▲ +40.0% |
| 2011 | -2.15x | $-13.98 Million | $6.50 Million | ▲ +12.4% |
| 2010 | -2.46x | $-16.04 Million | $6.54 Million | ▼ -58.7% |
| 2009 | -1.55x | $-15.19 Million | $9.82 Million | ▲ +46.6% |
| 2008 | -2.90x | $-29.91 Million | $10.31 Million | ▼ -124.8% |
| 2007 | -1.29x | $-23.14 Million | $17.94 Million | ▲ +40.2% |
| 2006 | -2.16x | $-20.17 Million | $9.36 Million | ▼ -112.9% |
| 2005 | -1.01x | $-15.14 Million | $14.95 Million | — |