Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. working capital to net assets ratio. Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. (BGMS) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 72.0% as of December 2025. Working capital of $4.92 Million (current assets of $6.26 Million minus current liabilities of $1.33 Million) is measured against net assets of $6.84 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. tangible equity quality to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. (2005–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. from 2005 to 2025. This chart shows how Bio Green Med Solution, Inc.'s Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 21 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 72.0%, reflecting working capital of $4.92 Million against net assets of $6.84 Million USD. See how many days can Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2005–2025)
Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2005 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. from 2005 to 2025, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see how large is Bio Green Med Solution, Inc.'s balance sheet.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 72.0% | $4.92 Million | $6.84 Million | $6.26 Million | $1.33 Million | ▼ -47.4 pp |
| 2024 | 119.3% | $-2.59 Million | $-2.17 Million | $3.67 Million | $6.27 Million | ▲ +237.4 pp |
| 2023 | -118.1% | $-717.00K | $607.00K | $7.44 Million | $8.16 Million | ▼ -200.8 pp |
| 2022 | 82.7% | $16.90 Million | $20.43 Million | $24.41 Million | $7.51 Million | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 2021 | 94.3% | $35.53 Million | $37.69 Million | $40.94 Million | $5.41 Million | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2020 | 99.2% | $32.98 Million | $33.26 Million | $35.47 Million | $2.49 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 99.1% | $11.60 Million | $11.70 Million | $14.02 Million | $2.42 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2018 | 100.4% | $15.34 Million | $15.27 Million | $19.79 Million | $4.45 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.4% | $21.86 Million | $21.77 Million | $25.97 Million | $4.11 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2016 | 100.6% | $14.36 Million | $14.27 Million | $19.62 Million | $5.26 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2015 | 99.9% | $18.81 Million | $18.84 Million | $24.57 Million | $5.75 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2014 | 99.2% | $21.51 Million | $21.69 Million | $29.00 Million | $7.49 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2013 | 98.8% | $27.68 Million | $28.02 Million | $35.17 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2012 | 95.2% | $9.54 Million | $10.02 Million | $18.87 Million | $9.34 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2011 | 99.1% | $19.33 Million | $19.50 Million | $25.83 Million | $6.50 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2010 | 98.4% | $24.52 Million | $24.92 Million | $31.05 Million | $6.54 Million | ▲ +22.0 pp |
| 2009 | 76.4% | $3.55 Million | $4.64 Million | $13.37 Million | $9.82 Million | ▼ -22.4 pp |
| 2008 | 98.8% | $20.39 Million | $20.64 Million | $29.01 Million | $8.63 Million | ▲ +14.1 pp |
| 2007 | 84.6% | $49.06 Million | $57.97 Million | $63.78 Million | $14.71 Million | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2006 | 93.2% | $50.24 Million | $53.92 Million | $58.16 Million | $7.92 Million | ▲ +40.9 pp |
| 2005 | 52.2% | $2.15 Million | $4.12 Million | $17.03 Million | $14.87 Million | — |