Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. Net Asset Quality Index
Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. net asset quality index. Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. (BGMS) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 83.6% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $8.19 Million minus total liabilities of $1.34 Million yields net assets of $6.84 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. (BGMS) shareholders funds for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. (2005–2025)
Net asset quality index of Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. from 2005 to 2025. This chart shows how Bio Green Med Solution, Inc.'s Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 21 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 83.6%, representing net assets of $6.84 Million against total assets of $8.19 Million USD. Check Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2005–2025)
Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. net asset quality index by year from 2005 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. from 2005 to 2025, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Bio Green Med Solution, Inc..
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 83.6% | $6.84 Million | $8.19 Million | $1.34 Million | ▲ +136.7 pp |
| 2024 | -53.1% | $-2.17 Million | $4.09 Million | $6.27 Million | ▼ -60.0 pp |
| 2023 | 6.9% | $607.00K | $8.80 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -66.0 pp |
| 2022 | 72.8% | $20.43 Million | $28.05 Million | $7.62 Million | ▼ -14.5 pp |
| 2021 | 87.4% | $37.69 Million | $43.14 Million | $5.44 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2020 | 90.4% | $33.26 Million | $36.80 Million | $3.54 Million | ▲ +14.0 pp |
| 2019 | 76.4% | $11.70 Million | $15.31 Million | $3.61 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2018 | 77.0% | $15.27 Million | $19.82 Million | $4.55 Million | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 2017 | 83.7% | $21.77 Million | $26.00 Million | $4.24 Million | ▲ +11.1 pp |
| 2016 | 72.6% | $14.27 Million | $19.66 Million | $5.39 Million | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2015 | 76.1% | $18.84 Million | $24.76 Million | $5.93 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2014 | 73.8% | $21.69 Million | $29.39 Million | $7.70 Million | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2013 | 78.9% | $28.02 Million | $35.52 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +27.1 pp |
| 2012 | 51.8% | $10.02 Million | $19.35 Million | $9.34 Million | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2011 | 75.0% | $19.50 Million | $26.00 Million | $6.50 Million | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2010 | 79.2% | $24.92 Million | $31.46 Million | $6.54 Million | ▲ +47.1 pp |
| 2009 | 32.1% | $4.64 Million | $14.47 Million | $9.82 Million | ▼ -34.6 pp |
| 2008 | 66.7% | $20.64 Million | $30.96 Million | $10.31 Million | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 2007 | 76.4% | $57.97 Million | $75.91 Million | $17.94 Million | ▼ -8.8 pp |
| 2006 | 85.2% | $53.92 Million | $63.28 Million | $9.36 Million | ▲ +63.6 pp |
| 2005 | 21.6% | $4.12 Million | $19.07 Million | $14.95 Million | — |