Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($29.90 Million) in one year. See BRID free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Bridgford Foods Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Bridgford Foods Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore BRID shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Bridgford Foods Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bridgford Foods Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BRID company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.18x | $-5.69 Million | $31.67 Million | ▼ -956.7% |
| 2024 | -0.02x | $-497.00K | $29.22 Million | ▼ -116.0% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $3.98 Million | $37.46 Million | ▲ +168.0% |
| 2022 | -0.16x | $-7.83 Million | $50.02 Million | ▼ -113.7% |
| 2021 | -0.07x | $-5.99 Million | $81.81 Million | ▼ -162.1% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $9.92 Million | $84.04 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $7.25 Million | $56.97 Million | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $8.27 Million | $35.81 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2017 | 0.40x | $16.77 Million | $41.51 Million | ▲ +331.4% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $4.53 Million | $48.34 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $7.46 Million | $39.66 Million | ▲ +254.0% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | $-4.02 Million | $32.93 Million | ▼ -201.7% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $3.76 Million | $31.31 Million | ▲ +170.0% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $1.84 Million | $41.41 Million | ▲ +161.6% |
| 2011 | -0.07x | $-2.32 Million | $32.13 Million | ▼ -137.3% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | $4.71 Million | $24.32 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $9.44 Million | $26.48 Million | ▲ +1856.7% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-394.00K | $19.42 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 2007 | 0.69x | $12.23 Million | $17.68 Million | ▲ +222.9% |
| 2006 | 0.21x | $4.87 Million | $22.75 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $4.51 Million | $24.70 Million | ▲ +429.0% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $908.00K | $26.28 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | $7.93 Million | $23.59 Million | ▲ +100.9% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $3.81 Million | $22.79 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $4.31 Million | $25.00 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2000 | 0.32x | $8.35 Million | $26.48 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 1999 | 0.35x | $9.60 Million | $27.40 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 1998 | 0.58x | $14.60 Million | $25.00 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 1997 | 0.48x | $10.20 Million | $21.10 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 1996 | 0.40x | $7.20 Million | $18.00 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 1995 | 0.36x | $5.60 Million | $15.70 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 1994 | 0.68x | $9.90 Million | $14.60 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 1993 | 0.42x | $4.80 Million | $11.30 Million | ▼ -13.5% |
| 1992 | 0.49x | $5.60 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 1991 | 0.37x | $3.40 Million | $9.20 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 1990 | 0.44x | $3.70 Million | $8.40 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 1989 | 0.39x | $3.40 Million | $8.80 Million | — |