Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($33.26 Million) in one year. See Bridgford Foods Corporation financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Bridgford Foods Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Bridgford Foods Corporation across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Bridgford Foods Corporation cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Bridgford Foods Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bridgford Foods Corporation. Check how high is Bridgford Foods Corporation's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.18x | $-5.69 Million | $31.67 Million | ▼ -956.7% |
| 2024 | -0.02x | $-497.00K | $29.22 Million | ▼ -116.0% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $3.98 Million | $37.46 Million | ▲ +168.0% |
| 2022 | -0.16x | $-7.83 Million | $50.02 Million | ▼ -113.7% |
| 2021 | -0.07x | $-5.99 Million | $81.81 Million | ▼ -162.1% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $9.92 Million | $84.04 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $7.25 Million | $56.97 Million | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $8.27 Million | $35.81 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2017 | 0.40x | $16.77 Million | $41.51 Million | ▲ +331.4% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $4.53 Million | $48.34 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $7.46 Million | $39.66 Million | ▲ +254.0% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | $-4.02 Million | $32.93 Million | ▼ -201.7% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $3.76 Million | $31.31 Million | ▲ +170.0% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $1.84 Million | $41.41 Million | ▲ +161.6% |
| 2011 | -0.07x | $-2.32 Million | $32.13 Million | ▼ -137.3% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | $4.71 Million | $24.32 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $9.44 Million | $26.48 Million | ▲ +1856.7% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-394.00K | $19.42 Million | ▼ -102.9% |
| 2007 | 0.69x | $12.23 Million | $17.68 Million | ▲ +222.9% |
| 2006 | 0.21x | $4.87 Million | $22.75 Million | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | $4.51 Million | $24.70 Million | ▲ +429.0% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $908.00K | $26.28 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | $7.93 Million | $23.59 Million | ▲ +100.9% |
| 2002 | 0.17x | $3.81 Million | $22.79 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $4.31 Million | $25.00 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 2000 | 0.32x | $8.35 Million | $26.48 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 1999 | 0.35x | $9.60 Million | $27.40 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 1998 | 0.58x | $14.60 Million | $25.00 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 1997 | 0.48x | $10.20 Million | $21.10 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 1996 | 0.40x | $7.20 Million | $18.00 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 1995 | 0.36x | $5.60 Million | $15.70 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 1994 | 0.68x | $9.90 Million | $14.60 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 1993 | 0.42x | $4.80 Million | $11.30 Million | ▼ -13.5% |
| 1992 | 0.49x | $5.60 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 1991 | 0.37x | $3.40 Million | $9.20 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 1990 | 0.44x | $3.70 Million | $8.40 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 1989 | 0.39x | $3.40 Million | $8.80 Million | — |