Cathay General Bancorp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cathay General Bancorp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $150.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($21.17 Billion) in one year. Check Cathay General Bancorp cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Cathay General Bancorp (1990–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Cathay General Bancorp from 1990 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Cathay General Bancorp across 35 annual periods. Check Cathay General Bancorp total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Cathay General Bancorp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2024)
Cathay General Bancorp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cathay General Bancorp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CATY cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.02x | $329.15 Million | $20.21 Billion | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $384.74 Million | $20.34 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $467.39 Million | $19.47 Billion | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $334.32 Million | $18.44 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $319.95 Million | $16.62 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $434.98 Million | $15.80 Billion | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $336.54 Million | $14.66 Billion | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $248.87 Million | $13.67 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $234.40 Million | $12.69 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $176.70 Million | $11.51 Billion | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $150.07 Million | $9.91 Billion | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $115.07 Million | $9.53 Billion | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $164.58 Million | $9.06 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $174.05 Million | $9.13 Billion | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $168.50 Million | $9.37 Billion | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $146.41 Million | $10.28 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $167.75 Million | $10.28 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $148.98 Million | $9.42 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $126.64 Million | $7.07 Billion | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $114.02 Million | $5.62 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $119.88 Million | $5.37 Billion | ▲ +958.8% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $10.36 Million | $4.92 Billion | ▼ -94.4% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $93.05 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $49.90 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $49.89 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $27.30 Million | $1.82 Billion | ▼ -31.3% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $35.50 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $25.00 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -34.5% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $35.60 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +49.2% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $17.10 Million | $992.90 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $15.50 Million | $855.80 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $11.30 Million | $797.00 Million | ▲ +170.2% |
| 1992 | -0.02x | $-15.30 Million | $757.10 Million | ▼ -187.2% |
| 1991 | 0.02x | $15.80 Million | $681.90 Million | ▲ +479.5% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $2.40 Million | $600.20 Million | — |