Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $150.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($21.17 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Cathay General Bancorp to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cathay General Bancorp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cathay General Bancorp across 35 annual periods. Also explore Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cathay General Bancorp (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cathay General Bancorp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CATY market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.02x | $329.15 Million | $20.21 Billion | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $384.74 Million | $20.34 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $467.39 Million | $19.47 Billion | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $334.32 Million | $18.44 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $319.95 Million | $16.62 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $434.98 Million | $15.80 Billion | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $336.54 Million | $14.66 Billion | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $248.87 Million | $13.67 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $234.40 Million | $12.69 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $176.70 Million | $11.51 Billion | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $150.07 Million | $9.91 Billion | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $115.07 Million | $9.53 Billion | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $164.58 Million | $9.06 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $174.05 Million | $9.13 Billion | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $168.50 Million | $9.37 Billion | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $146.41 Million | $10.28 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $167.75 Million | $10.28 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $148.98 Million | $9.42 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $126.64 Million | $7.07 Billion | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $114.02 Million | $5.62 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $119.88 Million | $5.37 Billion | ▲ +958.8% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $10.36 Million | $4.92 Billion | ▼ -94.4% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $93.05 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $49.90 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $49.89 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $27.30 Million | $1.82 Billion | ▼ -31.3% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $35.50 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $25.00 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -34.5% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $35.60 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +49.2% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $17.10 Million | $992.90 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $15.50 Million | $855.80 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $11.30 Million | $797.00 Million | ▲ +170.2% |
| 1992 | -0.02x | $-15.30 Million | $757.10 Million | ▼ -187.2% |
| 1991 | 0.02x | $15.80 Million | $681.90 Million | ▲ +479.5% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $2.40 Million | $600.20 Million | — |