Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $150.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($21.17 Billion) in one year. Explore Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cathay General Bancorp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cathay General Bancorp across 35 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Cathay General Bancorp for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cathay General Bancorp (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cathay General Bancorp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Cathay General Bancorp stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.02x | $329.15 Million | $20.21 Billion | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $384.74 Million | $20.34 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $467.39 Million | $19.47 Billion | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $334.32 Million | $18.44 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $319.95 Million | $16.62 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $434.98 Million | $15.80 Billion | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $336.54 Million | $14.66 Billion | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $248.87 Million | $13.67 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $234.40 Million | $12.69 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $176.70 Million | $11.51 Billion | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $150.07 Million | $9.91 Billion | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2013 | 0.01x | $115.07 Million | $9.53 Billion | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $164.58 Million | $9.06 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $174.05 Million | $9.13 Billion | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $168.50 Million | $9.37 Billion | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $146.41 Million | $10.28 Billion | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $167.75 Million | $10.28 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $148.98 Million | $9.42 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $126.64 Million | $7.07 Billion | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $114.02 Million | $5.62 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $119.88 Million | $5.37 Billion | ▲ +958.8% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $10.36 Million | $4.92 Billion | ▼ -94.4% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $93.05 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $49.90 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $49.89 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +66.7% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $27.30 Million | $1.82 Billion | ▼ -31.3% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $35.50 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $25.00 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -34.5% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $35.60 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +49.2% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $17.10 Million | $992.90 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $15.50 Million | $855.80 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $11.30 Million | $797.00 Million | ▲ +170.2% |
| 1992 | -0.02x | $-15.30 Million | $757.10 Million | ▼ -187.2% |
| 1991 | 0.02x | $15.80 Million | $681.90 Million | ▲ +479.5% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $2.40 Million | $600.20 Million | — |