Cathay General Bancorp Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Cathay General Bancorp working capital to net assets ratio. Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -265.9% as of December 2025. Working capital of $-7.78 Billion (current assets of $1.90 Billion minus current liabilities of $9.68 Billion) is measured against net assets of $2.93 Billion. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) tangible net worth to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Cathay General Bancorp (1990–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Cathay General Bancorp from 1990 to 2025. This chart shows how Cathay General Bancorp's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 36 annual periods from 1990 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at -265.9%, reflecting working capital of $-7.78 Billion against net assets of $2.93 Billion USD. See CATY days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Cathay General Bancorp Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Cathay General Bancorp working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Cathay General Bancorp from 1990 to 2025, covering 36 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Cathay General Bancorp asset portfolio.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -265.9% | $-7.78 Billion | $2.93 Billion | $1.90 Billion | $9.68 Billion | ▲ +362.3 pp |
| 2024 | -628.2% | $-17.88 Billion | $2.85 Billion | $1.81 Billion | $19.69 Billion | ▼ -14.5 pp |
| 2023 | -613.7% | $-16.79 Billion | $2.74 Billion | $2.53 Billion | $19.33 Billion | ▲ +24.4 pp |
| 2022 | -638.1% | $-15.79 Billion | $2.47 Billion | $2.72 Billion | $18.51 Billion | ▼ -48.4 pp |
| 2021 | -589.7% | $-14.42 Billion | $2.45 Billion | $3.63 Billion | $18.06 Billion | ▼ -27.6 pp |
| 2020 | -562.1% | $-13.59 Billion | $2.42 Billion | $2.52 Billion | $16.11 Billion | ▼ -12.2 pp |
| 2019 | -549.9% | $-12.62 Billion | $2.29 Billion | $2.10 Billion | $14.72 Billion | ▲ +6.5 pp |
| 2018 | -556.4% | $-11.81 Billion | $2.12 Billion | $1.89 Billion | $13.70 Billion | ▼ -892.4 pp |
| 2017 | 336.0% | $6.61 Billion | $1.97 Billion | $13.55 Billion | $6.94 Billion | ▲ +11.7 pp |
| 2016 | 324.3% | $5.93 Billion | $1.83 Billion | $12.47 Billion | $6.54 Billion | ▲ +814.9 pp |
| 2015 | -490.6% | $-8.58 Billion | $1.75 Billion | $2.33 Billion | $10.91 Billion | ▼ -40.0 pp |
| 2014 | -450.6% | $-7.22 Billion | $1.60 Billion | $2.01 Billion | $9.23 Billion | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2013 | -445.4% | $-6.50 Billion | $1.46 Billion | $2.28 Billion | $8.78 Billion | ▼ -30.6 pp |
| 2012 | -414.8% | $-6.76 Billion | $1.63 Billion | $1.87 Billion | $8.63 Billion | ▲ +39.8 pp |
| 2011 | -454.6% | $-6.89 Billion | $1.52 Billion | $1.74 Billion | $8.63 Billion | ▲ +118.1 pp |
| 2010 | -572.6% | $-8.22 Billion | $1.44 Billion | $329.05 Million | $8.55 Billion | ▲ +87.9 pp |
| 2009 | -660.5% | $-8.67 Billion | $1.31 Billion | $390.83 Million | $9.06 Billion | ▼ -19.3 pp |
| 2008 | -641.3% | $-8.35 Billion | $1.30 Billion | $153.42 Million | $8.50 Billion | ▲ +123.4 pp |
| 2007 | -764.7% | $-7.50 Billion | $980.42 Million | $221.47 Million | $7.72 Billion | ▼ -62.1 pp |
| 2006 | -702.6% | $-6.69 Billion | $951.57 Million | $154.06 Million | $6.84 Billion | ▼ -22.9 pp |
| 2005 | -679.7% | $-5.32 Billion | $782.12 Million | $134.04 Million | $5.45 Billion | ▲ +34.7 pp |
| 2004 | -714.5% | $-5.18 Billion | $724.61 Million | $107.84 Million | $5.29 Billion | ▲ +37.4 pp |
| 2003 | -751.9% | $-4.69 Billion | $623.71 Million | $133.25 Million | $4.82 Billion | ▲ +49.6 pp |
| 2002 | -801.5% | $-2.31 Billion | $287.96 Million | $85.23 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▲ +34.4 pp |
| 2001 | -835.9% | $-2.06 Billion | $246.01 Million | $88.06 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▲ +31.6 pp |
| 2000 | -867.5% | $-1.86 Billion | $214.79 Million | $81.32 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▲ +76.9 pp |
| 1999 | -944.4% | $-1.69 Billion | $179.10 Million | $77.30 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 1998 | -946.5% | $-1.48 Billion | $156.70 Million | $93.70 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▲ +36.3 pp |
| 1997 | -982.8% | $-1.34 Billion | $135.90 Million | $136.90 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▲ +93.7 pp |
| 1996 | -1076.4% | $-1.27 Billion | $118.40 Million | $90.20 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -122.8 pp |
| 1995 | -953.7% | $-901.20 Million | $94.50 Million | $83.00 Million | $984.20 Million | ▼ -36.7 pp |
| 1994 | -917.0% | $-782.20 Million | $85.30 Million | $63.50 Million | $845.70 Million | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 1993 | -909.8% | $-732.40 Million | $80.50 Million | $58.80 Million | $791.20 Million | ▼ -5.6 pp |
| 1992 | -904.2% | $-684.50 Million | $75.70 Million | $65.70 Million | $750.20 Million | ▲ +22.1 pp |
| 1991 | -926.3% | $-630.80 Million | $68.10 Million | $42.70 Million | $673.50 Million | ▼ -16.6 pp |
| 1990 | -909.7% | $-544.00 Million | $59.80 Million | $47.80 Million | $591.80 Million | — |