EDAP TMS SA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
EDAP TMS SA cash flow-to-debt ratio. EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($61.96 Million) in one year. Check EDAP cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of EDAP TMS SA (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of EDAP TMS SA from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for EDAP TMS SA across 29 annual periods. Check EDAP TMS SA cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
EDAP TMS SA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
EDAP TMS SA cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for EDAP TMS SA. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see EDAP TMS SA operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.28x | $-16.41 Million | $59.58 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2024 | -0.30x | $-13.58 Million | $45.17 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2023 | -0.42x | $-14.68 Million | $34.62 Million | ▼ -313.4% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-3.02 Million | $29.49 Million | ▼ -162.7% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $4.45 Million | $27.17 Million | ▲ +110.1% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $2.25 Million | $28.95 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $3.80 Million | $25.71 Million | ▲ +1908.1% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $175.00K | $23.78 Million | ▲ +105.2% |
| 2017 | -0.14x | $-3.06 Million | $21.74 Million | ▼ -378.4% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $1.12 Million | $22.14 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $1.34 Million | $24.15 Million | ▲ +193.0% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-1.01 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2013 | -0.14x | $-2.50 Million | $17.59 Million | ▼ -1851.0% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-162.00K | $22.28 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | $-737.00K | $23.84 Million | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2010 | -0.14x | $-3.82 Million | $27.04 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-3.66 Million | $27.80 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2008 | -0.17x | $-4.59 Million | $26.67 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2007 | -0.09x | $-2.73 Million | $30.55 Million | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2006 | -0.14x | $-1.90 Million | $13.17 Million | ▼ -479.0% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-284.53K | $11.42 Million | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2004 | -0.11x | $-1.13 Million | $9.93 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | $-3.64 Million | $12.93 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2002 | -0.70x | $-7.97 Million | $11.42 Million | ▼ -191.4% |
| 2001 | -0.24x | $-3.41 Million | $14.23 Million | ▼ -12667.8% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $29.81K | $15.65 Million | ▲ +101.6% |
| 1999 | -0.12x | $-2.54 Million | $20.99 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 1998 | -0.31x | $-6.39 Million | $20.46 Million | ▼ -1368.8% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | $-363.64K | $17.09 Million | — |