EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($61.96 Million) in one year. Check EDAP capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
EDAP TMS SA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for EDAP TMS SA across 29 annual periods. Also explore total assets of EDAP TMS SA for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for EDAP TMS SA (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for EDAP TMS SA. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EDAP TMS SA stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.28x | $-16.41 Million | $59.58 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2024 | -0.30x | $-13.58 Million | $45.17 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2023 | -0.42x | $-14.68 Million | $34.62 Million | ▼ -313.4% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-3.02 Million | $29.49 Million | ▼ -162.7% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $4.45 Million | $27.17 Million | ▲ +110.1% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $2.25 Million | $28.95 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $3.80 Million | $25.71 Million | ▲ +1908.1% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $175.00K | $23.78 Million | ▲ +105.2% |
| 2017 | -0.14x | $-3.06 Million | $21.74 Million | ▼ -378.4% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $1.12 Million | $22.14 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $1.34 Million | $24.15 Million | ▲ +193.0% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-1.01 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2013 | -0.14x | $-2.50 Million | $17.59 Million | ▼ -1851.0% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-162.00K | $22.28 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | $-737.00K | $23.84 Million | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2010 | -0.14x | $-3.82 Million | $27.04 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-3.66 Million | $27.80 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2008 | -0.17x | $-4.59 Million | $26.67 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2007 | -0.09x | $-2.73 Million | $30.55 Million | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2006 | -0.14x | $-1.90 Million | $13.17 Million | ▼ -479.0% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-284.53K | $11.42 Million | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2004 | -0.11x | $-1.13 Million | $9.93 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | $-3.64 Million | $12.93 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2002 | -0.70x | $-7.97 Million | $11.42 Million | ▼ -191.4% |
| 2001 | -0.24x | $-3.41 Million | $14.23 Million | ▼ -12667.8% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $29.81K | $15.65 Million | ▲ +101.6% |
| 1999 | -0.12x | $-2.54 Million | $20.99 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 1998 | -0.31x | $-6.39 Million | $20.46 Million | ▼ -1368.8% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | $-363.64K | $17.09 Million | — |