EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($61.96 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of EDAP TMS SA to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
EDAP TMS SA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for EDAP TMS SA across 29 annual periods. Also explore EDAP TMS SA equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for EDAP TMS SA (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for EDAP TMS SA. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.28x | $-16.41 Million | $59.58 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2024 | -0.30x | $-13.58 Million | $45.17 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2023 | -0.42x | $-14.68 Million | $34.62 Million | ▼ -313.4% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | $-3.02 Million | $29.49 Million | ▼ -162.7% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $4.45 Million | $27.17 Million | ▲ +110.1% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $2.25 Million | $28.95 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $3.80 Million | $25.71 Million | ▲ +1908.1% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $175.00K | $23.78 Million | ▲ +105.2% |
| 2017 | -0.14x | $-3.06 Million | $21.74 Million | ▼ -378.4% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $1.12 Million | $22.14 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $1.34 Million | $24.15 Million | ▲ +193.0% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-1.01 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2013 | -0.14x | $-2.50 Million | $17.59 Million | ▼ -1851.0% |
| 2012 | -0.01x | $-162.00K | $22.28 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2011 | -0.03x | $-737.00K | $23.84 Million | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2010 | -0.14x | $-3.82 Million | $27.04 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-3.66 Million | $27.80 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2008 | -0.17x | $-4.59 Million | $26.67 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2007 | -0.09x | $-2.73 Million | $30.55 Million | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2006 | -0.14x | $-1.90 Million | $13.17 Million | ▼ -479.0% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-284.53K | $11.42 Million | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2004 | -0.11x | $-1.13 Million | $9.93 Million | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | $-3.64 Million | $12.93 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2002 | -0.70x | $-7.97 Million | $11.42 Million | ▼ -191.4% |
| 2001 | -0.24x | $-3.41 Million | $14.23 Million | ▼ -12667.8% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $29.81K | $15.65 Million | ▲ +101.6% |
| 1999 | -0.12x | $-2.54 Million | $20.99 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 1998 | -0.31x | $-6.39 Million | $20.46 Million | ▼ -1368.8% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | $-363.64K | $17.09 Million | — |