EDAP TMS SA Net Asset Quality Index
EDAP TMS SA net asset quality index. EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 14.0% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $72.06 Million minus total liabilities of $61.96 Million yields net assets of $10.10 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See shareholders equity of EDAP TMS SA for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of EDAP TMS SA (1997–2025)
Net asset quality index of EDAP TMS SA from 1997 to 2025. This chart shows how EDAP TMS SA's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 14.0%, representing net assets of $10.10 Million against total assets of $72.06 Million USD. Check EDAP TMS SA PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
EDAP TMS SA Net Asset Quality Index by Year (1997–2025)
EDAP TMS SA net asset quality index by year from 1997 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for EDAP TMS SA from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is EDAP TMS SA worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24.6% | $19.41 Million | $79.00 Million | $59.58 Million | ▼ -22.9 pp |
| 2024 | 47.5% | $40.90 Million | $86.06 Million | $45.17 Million | ▼ -14.7 pp |
| 2023 | 62.2% | $56.92 Million | $91.55 Million | $34.62 Million | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2022 | 70.8% | $71.63 Million | $101.12 Million | $29.49 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2021 | 64.8% | $50.05 Million | $77.23 Million | $27.17 Million | ▲ +17.3 pp |
| 2020 | 47.6% | $26.25 Million | $55.19 Million | $28.95 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2019 | 51.6% | $27.36 Million | $53.07 Million | $25.71 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2018 | 51.2% | $24.96 Million | $48.74 Million | $23.78 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2017 | 53.6% | $25.16 Million | $46.90 Million | $21.74 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2016 | 52.5% | $24.45 Million | $46.59 Million | $22.14 Million | ▲ +15.1 pp |
| 2015 | 37.4% | $14.43 Million | $38.58 Million | $24.15 Million | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 2014 | 47.1% | $15.14 Million | $32.15 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +12.5 pp |
| 2013 | 34.5% | $9.28 Million | $26.87 Million | $17.59 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2012 | 26.8% | $8.16 Million | $30.44 Million | $22.28 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 26.8% | $8.71 Million | $32.55 Million | $23.84 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2010 | 24.8% | $8.90 Million | $35.94 Million | $27.04 Million | ▼ -6.4 pp |
| 2009 | 31.2% | $12.58 Million | $40.38 Million | $27.80 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2008 | 39.2% | $17.19 Million | $43.86 Million | $26.67 Million | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 2007 | 32.2% | $14.52 Million | $45.07 Million | $30.55 Million | ▼ -27.2 pp |
| 2006 | 59.4% | $19.30 Million | $32.47 Million | $13.17 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2005 | 60.3% | $17.36 Million | $28.77 Million | $11.42 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2004 | 64.4% | $17.95 Million | $27.88 Million | $9.93 Million | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2003 | 59.4% | $18.93 Million | $31.85 Million | $12.93 Million | ▼ -11.9 pp |
| 2002 | 71.3% | $28.40 Million | $39.82 Million | $11.42 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2001 | 73.3% | $38.98 Million | $53.21 Million | $14.23 Million | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2000 | 69.0% | $34.78 Million | $50.43 Million | $15.65 Million | ▲ +26.5 pp |
| 1999 | 42.4% | $15.47 Million | $36.46 Million | $20.99 Million | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 1998 | 54.9% | $24.90 Million | $45.36 Million | $20.46 Million | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 1997 | 66.4% | $33.82 Million | $50.91 Million | $17.09 Million | — |