EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) — Net Asset Quality Index
EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 14.0% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $72.06 Million minus total liabilities of $61.96 Million yields net assets of $10.10 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See EDAP defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
EDAP TMS SA Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2025)
This chart shows how EDAP TMS SA's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 14.0%, representing net assets of $10.10 Million against total assets of $72.06 Million USD. Explore EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) cash conversion ratio to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for EDAP TMS SA (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for EDAP TMS SA from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market cap of EDAP TMS SA.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24.6% | $19.41 Million | $79.00 Million | $59.58 Million | ▼ -22.9 pp |
| 2024 | 47.5% | $40.90 Million | $86.06 Million | $45.17 Million | ▼ -14.7 pp |
| 2023 | 62.2% | $56.92 Million | $91.55 Million | $34.62 Million | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2022 | 70.8% | $71.63 Million | $101.12 Million | $29.49 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2021 | 64.8% | $50.05 Million | $77.23 Million | $27.17 Million | ▲ +17.3 pp |
| 2020 | 47.6% | $26.25 Million | $55.19 Million | $28.95 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2019 | 51.6% | $27.36 Million | $53.07 Million | $25.71 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2018 | 51.2% | $24.96 Million | $48.74 Million | $23.78 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2017 | 53.6% | $25.16 Million | $46.90 Million | $21.74 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2016 | 52.5% | $24.45 Million | $46.59 Million | $22.14 Million | ▲ +15.1 pp |
| 2015 | 37.4% | $14.43 Million | $38.58 Million | $24.15 Million | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 2014 | 47.1% | $15.14 Million | $32.15 Million | $17.01 Million | ▲ +12.5 pp |
| 2013 | 34.5% | $9.28 Million | $26.87 Million | $17.59 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2012 | 26.8% | $8.16 Million | $30.44 Million | $22.28 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 26.8% | $8.71 Million | $32.55 Million | $23.84 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2010 | 24.8% | $8.90 Million | $35.94 Million | $27.04 Million | ▼ -6.4 pp |
| 2009 | 31.2% | $12.58 Million | $40.38 Million | $27.80 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2008 | 39.2% | $17.19 Million | $43.86 Million | $26.67 Million | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 2007 | 32.2% | $14.52 Million | $45.07 Million | $30.55 Million | ▼ -27.2 pp |
| 2006 | 59.4% | $19.30 Million | $32.47 Million | $13.17 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2005 | 60.3% | $17.36 Million | $28.77 Million | $11.42 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2004 | 64.4% | $17.95 Million | $27.88 Million | $9.93 Million | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2003 | 59.4% | $18.93 Million | $31.85 Million | $12.93 Million | ▼ -11.9 pp |
| 2002 | 71.3% | $28.40 Million | $39.82 Million | $11.42 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2001 | 73.3% | $38.98 Million | $53.21 Million | $14.23 Million | ▲ +4.3 pp |
| 2000 | 69.0% | $34.78 Million | $50.43 Million | $15.65 Million | ▲ +26.5 pp |
| 1999 | 42.4% | $15.47 Million | $36.46 Million | $20.99 Million | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 1998 | 54.9% | $24.90 Million | $45.36 Million | $20.46 Million | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 1997 | 66.4% | $33.82 Million | $50.91 Million | $17.09 Million | — |