EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
EDAP TMS SA (EDAP) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 11.4% as of June 2023. Strategic assets (PP&E of $7.21 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $7.21 Million, measured against net assets of $63.21 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
EDAP TMS SA Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2022)
This chart shows how EDAP TMS SA's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2000 to 2022. As of June 2023, the index stands at 11.4%, representing strategic assets of $7.21 Million against net assets of $63.21 Million USD. Explore EDAP TMS SA operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for EDAP TMS SA (2000–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for EDAP TMS SA from 2000 to 2022, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see EDAP market cap.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8.4% | $5.98 Million | $5.98 Million | $- | $71.63 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2021 | 10.3% | $5.17 Million | $5.17 Million | $- | $50.05 Million | ▼ -11.0 pp |
| 2020 | 21.3% | $5.60 Million | $5.60 Million | $- | $26.25 Million | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2019 | 24.5% | $6.72 Million | $6.72 Million | $0.00 | $27.36 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2018 | 16.9% | $4.21 Million | $4.21 Million | $0.00 | $24.96 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2017 | 14.6% | $3.68 Million | $3.68 Million | $0.00 | $25.16 Million | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2016 | 11.3% | $2.77 Million | $2.77 Million | $0.00 | $24.45 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2015 | 14.7% | $2.12 Million | $2.12 Million | $0.00 | $14.43 Million | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2014 | 24.8% | $3.76 Million | $3.76 Million | $0.00 | $15.14 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2013 | 24.6% | $2.28 Million | $2.28 Million | $- | $9.28 Million | ▼ -8.3 pp |
| 2012 | 32.9% | $2.68 Million | $2.68 Million | $- | $8.16 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2011 | 37.7% | $3.29 Million | $3.29 Million | $- | $8.71 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2010 | 42.9% | $3.82 Million | $3.82 Million | $- | $8.90 Million | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2009 | 37.5% | $4.71 Million | $4.71 Million | $- | $12.58 Million | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 2008 | 30.5% | $5.24 Million | $5.24 Million | $- | $17.19 Million | ▼ -11.6 pp |
| 2007 | 42.0% | $6.10 Million | $6.10 Million | $- | $14.52 Million | ▲ +20.1 pp |
| 2006 | 22.0% | $4.24 Million | $4.24 Million | $- | $19.30 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2005 | 21.4% | $3.71 Million | $3.71 Million | $- | $17.36 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2004 | 21.2% | $3.80 Million | $3.80 Million | $- | $17.95 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2003 | 19.3% | $3.66 Million | $3.66 Million | $- | $18.93 Million | ▲ +12.0 pp |
| 2002 | 7.3% | $2.08 Million | $2.08 Million | $- | $28.40 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2001 | 5.1% | $1.99 Million | $1.99 Million | $- | $38.98 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2000 | 4.9% | $1.71 Million | $1.71 Million | $- | $34.78 Million | — |