Full House Resorts Inc (FLL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Full House Resorts Inc (FLL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.79 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($635.86 Million) in one year. Explore Full House Resorts Inc long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Full House Resorts Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Full House Resorts Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Full House Resorts Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Full House Resorts Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Full House Resorts Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see FLL stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $9.97 Million | $670.20 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $13.85 Million | $632.84 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $22.34 Million | $610.61 Million | ▲ +314.3% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $4.38 Million | $495.54 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $29.50 Million | $361.13 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $8.99 Million | $155.94 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $10.47 Million | $155.24 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $9.82 Million | $122.53 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $7.14 Million | $121.44 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $7.92 Million | $120.77 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $7.51 Million | $86.25 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $7.56 Million | $83.45 Million | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $12.28 Million | $76.47 Million | ▲ +404.6% |
| 2012 | -0.05x | $-4.30 Million | $81.59 Million | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $27.01 Million | $39.17 Million | ▼ -86.0% |
| 2010 | 4.94x | $18.07 Million | $3.66 Million | ▲ +181.1% |
| 2009 | 1.76x | $11.65 Million | $6.63 Million | ▲ +617.0% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | $2.28 Million | $9.28 Million | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $4.11 Million | $25.22 Million | ▲ +1104.4% |
| 2006 | -0.02x | $-113.66K | $7.00 Million | ▼ -102.6% |
| 2005 | 0.62x | $2.37 Million | $3.84 Million | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $771.06K | $2.91 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $448.00K | $2.67 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 2002 | 0.69x | $1.77 Million | $2.57 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2001 | 0.51x | $1.96 Million | $3.84 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2000 | 0.47x | $1.58 Million | $3.38 Million | ▲ +243.8% |
| 1999 | -0.33x | $-1.30 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -158.2% |
| 1998 | 0.56x | $2.40 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +99.3% |
| 1997 | 0.28x | $2.10 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +548.0% |
| 1996 | -0.06x | $-500.00K | $8.00 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 1995 | -0.07x | $-1.20 Million | $16.50 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 1994 | -0.25x | $-700.00K | $2.80 Million | ▼ -350.0% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $400.00K | $4.00 Million | — |