Full House Resorts Inc (FLL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Full House Resorts Inc (FLL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.79 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($635.86 Million) in one year. See FLL free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Full House Resorts Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Full House Resorts Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore FLL net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Full House Resorts Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Full House Resorts Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Full House Resorts Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $9.97 Million | $670.20 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $13.85 Million | $632.84 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $22.34 Million | $610.61 Million | ▲ +314.3% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $4.38 Million | $495.54 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $29.50 Million | $361.13 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $8.99 Million | $155.94 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $10.47 Million | $155.24 Million | ▼ -15.9% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $9.82 Million | $122.53 Million | ▲ +36.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $7.14 Million | $121.44 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $7.92 Million | $120.77 Million | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $7.51 Million | $86.25 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $7.56 Million | $83.45 Million | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $12.28 Million | $76.47 Million | ▲ +404.6% |
| 2012 | -0.05x | $-4.30 Million | $81.59 Million | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $27.01 Million | $39.17 Million | ▼ -86.0% |
| 2010 | 4.94x | $18.07 Million | $3.66 Million | ▲ +181.1% |
| 2009 | 1.76x | $11.65 Million | $6.63 Million | ▲ +617.0% |
| 2008 | 0.25x | $2.28 Million | $9.28 Million | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $4.11 Million | $25.22 Million | ▲ +1104.4% |
| 2006 | -0.02x | $-113.66K | $7.00 Million | ▼ -102.6% |
| 2005 | 0.62x | $2.37 Million | $3.84 Million | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $771.06K | $2.91 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $448.00K | $2.67 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 2002 | 0.69x | $1.77 Million | $2.57 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2001 | 0.51x | $1.96 Million | $3.84 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2000 | 0.47x | $1.58 Million | $3.38 Million | ▲ +243.8% |
| 1999 | -0.33x | $-1.30 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -158.2% |
| 1998 | 0.56x | $2.40 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +99.3% |
| 1997 | 0.28x | $2.10 Million | $7.50 Million | ▲ +548.0% |
| 1996 | -0.06x | $-500.00K | $8.00 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 1995 | -0.07x | $-1.20 Million | $16.50 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 1994 | -0.25x | $-700.00K | $2.80 Million | ▼ -350.0% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $400.00K | $4.00 Million | — |