Heidrick & Struggles International (HSII) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Heidrick & Struggles International (HSII) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.18x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $134.68 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($755.04 Million) in one year. See HSII free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Heidrick & Struggles International Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Heidrick & Struggles International across 27 annual periods. Also explore Heidrick & Struggles International (HSII) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Heidrick & Struggles International (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Heidrick & Struggles International. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see HSII company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.20x | $150.43 Million | $741.37 Million | ▲ +614.5% |
| 2023 | -0.04x | $-26.79 Million | $679.31 Million | ▼ -125.3% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $119.29 Million | $764.99 Million | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $271.40 Million | $770.78 Million | ▲ +684.4% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $23.35 Million | $520.21 Million | ▼ -69.5% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $78.64 Million | $535.06 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2018 | 0.24x | $102.90 Million | $433.47 Million | ▲ +32.7% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $66.97 Million | $374.50 Million | ▲ +132.6% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $24.82 Million | $322.91 Million | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $57.58 Million | $317.92 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $56.76 Million | $324.04 Million | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $44.03 Million | $305.35 Million | ▲ +184.7% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $12.49 Million | $246.65 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $44.77 Million | $264.27 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | $83.54 Million | $250.49 Million | ▲ +184.4% |
| 2009 | -0.40x | $-72.73 Million | $184.00 Million | ▼ -315.9% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $51.39 Million | $280.65 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $105.81 Million | $307.08 Million | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $99.77 Million | $256.06 Million | ▲ +102.2% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $33.42 Million | $173.44 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $25.66 Million | $205.16 Million | ▲ +114.2% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $10.40 Million | $178.22 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2002 | 0.04x | $6.03 Million | $163.35 Million | ▲ +132.7% |
| 2001 | -0.11x | $-20.49 Million | $181.51 Million | ▼ -129.8% |
| 2000 | 0.38x | $89.36 Million | $235.97 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 1999 | 0.33x | $54.80 Million | $166.80 Million | ▲ +257.4% |
| 1998 | 0.09x | $7.50 Million | $81.60 Million | — |