The Intergroup Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
The Intergroup Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. The Intergroup Corporation (INTG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.32 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($218.62 Million) in one year. Check The Intergroup Corporation investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of The Intergroup Corporation (1991–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of The Intergroup Corporation from 1991 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for The Intergroup Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of The Intergroup Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
The Intergroup Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2026)
The Intergroup Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for The Intergroup Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see INTG cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.02x | $3.45 Million | $218.62 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2025 | 0.03x | $5.89 Million | $218.41 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $6.81 Million | $214.28 Million | ▲ +6547.0% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $-107.00K | $216.96 Million | ▼ -111.2% |
| 2022 | 0.00x | $921.00K | $209.05 Million | ▲ +104.7% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | $-19.82 Million | $211.58 Million | ▼ -454.7% |
| 2020 | -0.02x | $-3.45 Million | $204.46 Million | ▼ -123.6% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $14.27 Million | $199.31 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $11.45 Million | $201.65 Million | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $6.29 Million | $208.53 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $8.97 Million | $209.36 Million | ▲ +5586.3% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | $-162.00K | $207.39 Million | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $3.28 Million | $232.09 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $4.58 Million | $140.93 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $5.22 Million | $136.24 Million | ▲ +91.2% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $2.96 Million | $147.86 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | $5.68 Million | $135.51 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $7.03 Million | $141.30 Million | ▲ +1391.7% |
| 2008 | 0.00x | $465.00K | $139.38 Million | ▼ -84.2% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $3.26 Million | $154.39 Million | ▲ +614.5% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $319.00K | $107.97 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $3.93 Million | $108.54 Million | ▲ +386.3% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $1.12 Million | $150.41 Million | ▲ +113.1% |
| 2003 | -0.06x | $-6.40 Million | $112.82 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | $-5.11 Million | $62.78 Million | ▼ -500.9% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $1.84 Million | $90.66 Million | ▲ +369.6% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $489.00K | $113.07 Million | ▲ +334.4% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-143.00K | $77.50 Million | ▼ -124.7% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $448.00K | $59.89 Million | ▼ -90.0% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $3.44 Million | $45.91 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $3.30 Million | $38.76 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 1995 | 0.06x | $2.48 Million | $40.31 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $2.10 Million | $35.30 Million | ▼ -29.3% |
| 1993 | 0.08x | $2.50 Million | $29.70 Million | ▲ +424.0% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $400.00K | $24.90 Million | ▼ -48.2% |
| 1991 | 0.03x | $800.00K | $25.80 Million | — |