The Intergroup Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio
The Intergroup Corporation tangible net worth ratio. The Intergroup Corporation (INTG) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of September 2013. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($5.58 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check The Intergroup Corporation PP&E and investment ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of The Intergroup Corporation (1986–2013)
Tangible net worth ratio of The Intergroup Corporation from 1986 to 2013. This chart shows how The Intergroup Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 27 annual periods from 1986 to 2013. As of September 2013, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $5.58 Million with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. See The Intergroup Corporation short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
The Intergroup Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1986–2013)
The Intergroup Corporation tangible net worth ratio by year from 1986 to 2013. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for The Intergroup Corporation from 1986 to 2013, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see The Intergroup Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 100.0% | $3.75 Million | $0.00 | $144.69 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $3.59 Million | $0.00 | $139.82 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $6.50 Million | $0.00 | $154.37 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $1.04 Million | $0.00 | $142.34 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $8.75 Million | $0.00 | $148.13 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $5.46 Million | $0.00 | $159.84 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $14.91 Million | $0.00 | $122.88 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $18.77 Million | $0.00 | $127.31 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2004 | 97.9% | $26.27 Million | $555.00K | $176.67 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $22.77 Million | $0.00 | $135.59 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $21.53 Million | $0.00 | $84.31 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $30.02 Million | $0.00 | $120.68 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $31.10 Million | $0.00 | $144.17 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $22.48 Million | $0.00 | $99.98 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $23.13 Million | $0.00 | $83.02 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $13.60 Million | $0.00 | $59.52 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $9.13 Million | $0.00 | $47.88 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $6.54 Million | $0.00 | $46.84 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $17.20 Million | $0.00 | $52.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $9.80 Million | $0.00 | $39.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1992 | 100.0% | $8.10 Million | $0.00 | $33.00 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1991 | 100.0% | $7.70 Million | $0.00 | $33.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1990 | 100.0% | $8.40 Million | $0.00 | $35.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1989 | 100.0% | $4.60 Million | $0.00 | $37.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1988 | 100.0% | $12.90 Million | $0.00 | $36.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1987 | 100.0% | $15.50 Million | $0.00 | $36.10 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1986 | 100.0% | $9.80 Million | $0.00 | $22.60 Million | — |