Jack In The Box Inc (JACK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Jack In The Box Inc (JACK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $33.73 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.53 Billion) in one year. See JACK FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Jack In The Box Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Jack In The Box Inc across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Jack In The Box Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jack In The Box Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jack In The Box Inc. Check Jack In The Box Inc (JACK) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $162.36 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $68.82 Million | $3.59 Billion | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $215.01 Million | $3.72 Billion | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $162.88 Million | $3.66 Billion | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $201.12 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▲ +47.3% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $143.53 Million | $2.70 Billion | ▼ -46.5% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $168.41 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $108.88 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $171.84 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $134.18 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -51.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $226.88 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $201.02 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $198.87 Million | $847.19 Million | ▲ +80.6% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $136.73 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $124.26 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +73.5% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $61.87 Million | $886.63 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $148.75 Million | $931.42 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $172.38 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | $179.81 Million | $965.11 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2006 | 0.25x | $205.84 Million | $809.58 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | $154.21 Million | $772.61 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | $199.65 Million | $771.27 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $147.81 Million | $692.05 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2002 | 0.27x | $158.99 Million | $599.33 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2001 | 0.28x | $173.35 Million | $616.29 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $142.06 Million | $590.48 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $156.70 Million | $615.84 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | $150.50 Million | $606.60 Million | ▲ +48.1% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $99.50 Million | $593.90 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $84.10 Million | $602.20 Million | ▲ +163.2% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $33.50 Million | $631.40 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 1994 | 0.05x | $29.40 Million | $640.20 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $25.70 Million | $751.30 Million | ▼ -65.5% |
| 1992 | 0.10x | $66.30 Million | $668.60 Million | ▲ +116.5% |
| 1991 | 0.05x | $37.30 Million | $814.30 Million | — |