Jack in the Box Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Jack in the Box Inc. tangible net worth ratio. Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 7.4% as of September 2015. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($14.77 Million) from net assets ($15.95 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check asset allocation strategy of Jack in the Box Inc. to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Jack in the Box Inc. (1991–2015)
Tangible net worth ratio of Jack in the Box Inc. from 1991 to 2015. This chart shows how Jack in the Box Inc.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 1991 to 2015. As of September 2015, the ratio stands at 7.4%, reflecting net assets of $15.95 Million with intangible assets of $14.77 Million USD. See JACK net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Jack in the Box Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1991–2015)
Jack in the Box Inc. tangible net worth ratio by year from 1991 to 2015. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Jack in the Box Inc. from 1991 to 2015, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see JACK market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 7.4% | $15.95 Million | $14.77 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -86.5 pp |
| 2014 | 93.9% | $257.91 Million | $15.60 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2013 | 96.5% | $472.02 Million | $16.39 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2012 | 95.8% | $411.94 Million | $17.21 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 95.7% | $405.96 Million | $17.50 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2010 | 96.5% | $520.46 Million | $17.99 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2009 | 96.5% | $524.49 Million | $18.43 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2008 | 95.8% | $457.11 Million | $19.25 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2007 | 95.1% | $409.58 Million | $20.06 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2006 | 97.0% | $710.88 Million | $21.02 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2005 | 96.1% | $565.37 Million | $22.09 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +16.6 pp |
| 2004 | 79.5% | $553.40 Million | $113.48 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2003 | 74.5% | $450.43 Million | $114.81 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -11.1 pp |
| 2002 | 85.6% | $464.12 Million | $66.62 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -14.4 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $413.53 Million | $0.00 | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +27.0 pp |
| 2000 | 73.0% | $316.35 Million | $85.30 Million | $906.83 Million | ▲ +13.6 pp |
| 1999 | 59.4% | $217.80 Million | $88.40 Million | $833.64 Million | ▲ +12.7 pp |
| 1998 | 46.7% | $137.00 Million | $73.00 Million | $743.60 Million | ▲ +47.6 pp |
| 1997 | -0.9% | $87.90 Million | $88.70 Million | $681.80 Million | ▲ +30.8 pp |
| 1996 | -31.7% | $51.40 Million | $67.70 Million | $653.60 Million | ▲ +91.3 pp |
| 1995 | -123.0% | $31.30 Million | $69.80 Million | $662.70 Million | ▼ -86.5 pp |
| 1994 | -36.5% | $100.10 Million | $136.60 Million | $740.30 Million | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 1993 | -41.1% | $139.10 Million | $196.30 Million | $890.40 Million | ▼ -102.7 pp |
| 1992 | 61.6% | $246.90 Million | $94.80 Million | $915.50 Million | ▲ +154.5 pp |
| 1991 | -92.9% | $50.50 Million | $97.40 Million | $864.80 Million | — |