Jack In The Box Inc (JACK) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Jack In The Box Inc (JACK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 7.4% as of September 2015. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($14.77 Million) from net assets ($15.95 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore how fast is Jack In The Box Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Jack In The Box Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1991–2015)
This chart shows how Jack In The Box Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 1991 to 2015. As of September 2015, the ratio stands at 7.4%, reflecting net assets of $15.95 Million with intangible assets of $14.77 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Jack In The Box Inc (JACK) total market value.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Jack In The Box Inc (1991–2015)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Jack In The Box Inc from 1991 to 2015, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore JACK capex reinvestment rate to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 7.4% | $15.95 Million | $14.77 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -86.5 pp |
| 2014 | 93.9% | $257.91 Million | $15.60 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2013 | 96.5% | $472.02 Million | $16.39 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2012 | 95.8% | $411.94 Million | $17.21 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 95.7% | $405.96 Million | $17.50 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2010 | 96.5% | $520.46 Million | $17.99 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2009 | 96.5% | $524.49 Million | $18.43 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2008 | 95.8% | $457.11 Million | $19.25 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2007 | 95.1% | $409.58 Million | $20.06 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2006 | 97.0% | $710.88 Million | $21.02 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2005 | 96.1% | $565.37 Million | $22.09 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +16.6 pp |
| 2004 | 79.5% | $553.40 Million | $113.48 Million | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2003 | 74.5% | $450.43 Million | $114.81 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -11.1 pp |
| 2002 | 85.6% | $464.12 Million | $66.62 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -14.4 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $413.53 Million | $0.00 | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +27.0 pp |
| 2000 | 73.0% | $316.35 Million | $85.30 Million | $906.83 Million | ▲ +13.6 pp |
| 1999 | 59.4% | $217.80 Million | $88.40 Million | $833.64 Million | ▲ +12.7 pp |
| 1998 | 46.7% | $137.00 Million | $73.00 Million | $743.60 Million | ▲ +47.6 pp |
| 1997 | -0.9% | $87.90 Million | $88.70 Million | $681.80 Million | ▲ +30.8 pp |
| 1996 | -31.7% | $51.40 Million | $67.70 Million | $653.60 Million | ▲ +91.3 pp |
| 1995 | -123.0% | $31.30 Million | $69.80 Million | $662.70 Million | ▼ -86.5 pp |
| 1994 | -36.5% | $100.10 Million | $136.60 Million | $740.30 Million | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 1993 | -41.1% | $139.10 Million | $196.30 Million | $890.40 Million | ▼ -102.7 pp |
| 1992 | 61.6% | $246.90 Million | $94.80 Million | $915.50 Million | ▲ +154.5 pp |
| 1991 | -92.9% | $50.50 Million | $97.40 Million | $864.80 Million | — |