Jack In The Box Inc (JACK) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Jack In The Box Inc (JACK) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 4565.1% as of September 2015. Strategic assets (PP&E of $728.26 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $728.26 Million, measured against net assets of $15.95 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. See net asset quality index of Jack In The Box Inc to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Jack In The Box Inc Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2015)
This chart shows how Jack In The Box Inc's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2000 to 2015. As of September 2015, the index stands at 4565.1%, representing strategic assets of $728.26 Million against net assets of $15.95 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see JACK company net worth.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Jack In The Box Inc (2000–2015)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Jack In The Box Inc from 2000 to 2015, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. See Jack In The Box Inc (JACK) shareholders funds for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4565.1% | $728.26 Million | $728.26 Million | $- | $15.95 Million | ▲ +4285.1 pp |
| 2014 | 280.0% | $722.13 Million | $722.13 Million | $- | $257.91 Million | ▲ +116.7 pp |
| 2013 | 163.3% | $770.86 Million | $770.86 Million | $- | $472.02 Million | ▼ -35.9 pp |
| 2012 | 199.2% | $820.79 Million | $820.79 Million | $- | $411.94 Million | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 2011 | 210.7% | $855.43 Million | $855.43 Million | $- | $405.96 Million | ▲ +42.0 pp |
| 2010 | 168.7% | $878.04 Million | $878.04 Million | $- | $520.46 Million | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2009 | 178.5% | $936.29 Million | $936.29 Million | $- | $524.49 Million | ▼ -27.8 pp |
| 2008 | 206.3% | $943.06 Million | $943.06 Million | $- | $457.11 Million | ▼ -26.2 pp |
| 2007 | 232.5% | $952.17 Million | $952.17 Million | $- | $409.58 Million | ▲ +103.8 pp |
| 2006 | 128.7% | $914.78 Million | $914.78 Million | $- | $710.88 Million | ▼ -26.6 pp |
| 2005 | 155.3% | $877.99 Million | $877.99 Million | $- | $565.37 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2004 | 155.9% | $862.61 Million | $862.61 Million | $- | $553.40 Million | ▼ -36.6 pp |
| 2003 | 192.5% | $866.96 Million | $866.96 Million | $- | $450.43 Million | ▲ +10.0 pp |
| 2002 | 182.5% | $846.93 Million | $846.93 Million | $- | $464.12 Million | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2001 | 188.5% | $779.47 Million | $779.47 Million | $- | $413.53 Million | ▼ -26.3 pp |
| 2000 | 214.7% | $679.36 Million | $679.36 Million | $- | $316.35 Million | — |